The Constitutional Convention. I don't remember what it was fixing, I'm sorry!
<span>In which sentence should the italicized word(s) be capitalized?
a. I went with my mom, dad, and two brothers to the state fair.
b. You have three choices of highlighter: red, green, or yellow.
c. Have you talked to aunt Judy today?
d. We went sailing on a lake about 100 miles from here.
(OpenStudy was used in the making of this answer)</span>
La estructura del texto debe tener en cuenta las características de cada una de sus partes que son Título, Introducción, Cuerpo y Conclusión.
Las partes de un texto son:
- Título: Es un término que se refiere a la palabra o frase que enuncia el asunto principal de un libro.
- Introducción: Es un término que se refiere a la parte inicial de un texto en la que se contextualizan los aspectos más importantes del texto al lector.
- Desarrollo: Es un término que se refiere a la parte del texto en la que se desarrollan las ideas principales expuestas en la introducción.
- Conclusión: Es un término que se refiere a la parte final del texto en la que se hace una síntesis de la información presentada, se cierra el tema del texto o se deja una reflexión al lector.
De acuerdo con lo anterior, el estudiante podrá identificar los elementos del texto Auschwitz como advertencia.
Esta pregunta está incompleta porque le falta el texto. No obstante, la respondo basada en mi conocimiento previo.
Aprenda más en: brainly.com/question/22520098
Answer:
Hi Paul,
<u>1) I have just started(just/start)</u> working as a tour guide in Prague and I <u>2) am having (have)</u> a fantastic time! <u>3) have you ever been (you/ever/be)</u> to Prague? It's such an interesting place. Every day, I <u>4) show (show)</u> five groups of tourists around the city and, for the past two days, I <u>5) have been leading (lead)</u> a night tour, too. It's called the Prague Ghost Tour, but I <u>6) haven't seen (not/see)</u> a ghost yet! <u>7) Are you working (you/work) </u>at the moment? If not, Toby <u>8) is visiting (visit)</u> me next weekend. Why don't you come too? You <u>9) always say (always/say)</u> that you want to visit Prague. Toby <u>10) flies (fly)</u> from Gatwick Airport at 7 pm on Friday. There are still a few seats left on the flight, so let me know!
Chris
Explanation:
The text has different tenses:
- Present perfect simple: it is in the first, third, and sixth points.
We use present perfect to talk about activities in the recent past, like in the first and sixth case where the word "just" and "yet" indicates these recent past events or activities. We also use it to talk about experiences, like point three, where we ask Paul about Prague. The word ever indicates this tense use since we can only use it in interrogative and negative questions in the present perfect.
- Present continuous: point two is telling us what the person is feeling at the moment. In point seven, the present continuous tells us about an activity taking place in the present. In point eight, we use the present continuous tense since it talks about a plan in the future that has already been planed.
- Present simple: Is present in point four to talk about Paul's routine at work. In point nine, we use the present simple tense to talk about a habit, which in this case is something that he says regularly. Lastly, it is in point ten to indicate plans that have a date or time set.
- Present perfect continuous: is in point five, and we use it to talk about activities that started a short while ago and that are still happening. We do not use the present perfect simple tense because it would indicate that the activity started not in the recent past.
Answer: The tu quoque fallacy
Explanation:
The fallacy that's illustrated by the statement "The customers should be more polite." is the tu quoque fallacy.
The tu quoque fallacy occurs when an invalid attempt is made by a person while responding to criticism. From the question, we can infer that the person accused the customer while responding to the customer's rude behaviour. This is an example of the tu quoque fallacy. It is when a person discredits the argument of others
