1st Amendment- If I didn't have the ability to speak freely, I wouldn't be able to have an opinion causing me to not be the person I am today.
2nd Amendment- Having no possibility of having bare arms would make me feel like I'd have no possibility of protection if I ever choose to have a gun in my possession.
4th Amendment- For people to rummage as they please in my home because they are in the power of authority terrifies me. You must have a reason that's by law reasonable which makes all feel safe on the front and end of the line.
The one explanation for this fact based on the above statement is "Congress has authorized the use of military force without the support of the president." Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
As the Cold War heated up in the 1950s, the United States made decisions on foreign policy with the goal of containing communism. To maintain its hegemony in the Western Hemisphere, the U.S. intervened in Guatemala in 1954 and removed its elected president, Jacobo Arbenz Guzman, on the premise that he was soft on communism.
This violated the separation of powers idea
The separation of powers was that power should be separated between various people or institutions in order to ensure that the government is fair. If the King controls the courts then the courts just act according to the King's will, even if the King does something that is illegal which means that the King is a tyrant and an absolutist.
They created a democracy untainted by wealth, privileged birth or corruption where every (eligible) citizen can take part in politics/ assembly.
