During World War II, which battle was the first significant US victory in the Pacific?

2 answers:

ozzi3 years ago

8 0

During World War II, it was the "Battle of Midway" that was the first significant US victory in the Pacific, since the US was able to inflict heavy losses on the Japanese fleet.

snow_tiger [21]3 years ago

5 0

The options of the question are, A) Battle of Coral Sea. B) Battle of Midway. C) Battle of Guadalcanal. D) Battle of Iwo Jima.

The correct answer is B) Battle of Midway.

<em>During the World War II, the battle that was the first significant victory for the United States was the Battle of Midway. </em>

The U.S. had to wait for six months after the attack of Pearl Harbor to defeat Japan and get an important offensive position in the Pacific. The American intelligence intercepted many messages from Japanese Admiral Yamamoto Isoroku. Historians considered the Battle of Midway victory, a turning point for the U.S. and its Allies. Yes, the battle of Midway was the first significant victory for the United States during World War II.

You might be interested in

Describe the differences between an absolute monarch and an enlightened monarch. Use specific examples to illustrate your points

Jet001 [13]

Answer:

The term "enlightened monarch" is a type of "absolute monarch". A "constitutional monarch" has many legal checks on their power. An "enlightened monarch" still has all of the power, but they voluntarily choose to use it in accordance with enlightened principals. they support the arts and education and social agenda.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Amnesty International is a(n) __________ organization concerned primarily with __________.

jeyben [28]

Amnesty International is a non-governmental organization concerned primarily with human rights.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was the condition of the Korean Peninsula immediately after World War II?

Troyanec [42]

Korea was divided by the US and the USSR

5 0

3 years ago

What is the significance of the English Bill of Rights on the development of the U.S Constitution?

guapka [62]

Some believed that the Constitution did not give the new federal government the ability to restrict inherent rights, so no list of those rights was necessary. Others worried that if the rights were listed, they would invariably forget some and the list would ever be incomplete. Finally, the argument was that the states each had their own constitutions, too, and that rights were best protected at a state level.

6 0

3 years ago

Iiidjdjfjfjdjndndjxixjxjn

Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

iiidjdjfjfjdjndndjxixjxjn

Explanation:

because of iiidjdjfjfjdjndndjxixjxjn made iiidjdjfjfjdjndndjxixjxjn want to go to iiidjdjfjfjdjndndjxixjxjn, so he ended up going to iiidjdjfjfjdjndndjxixjxjn insetad of iiidjdjfjfjdjndndjxixjxjn.

4 0

3 years ago