1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lorasvet [3.4K]
3 years ago
6

What was the most likely reason that Allied leaders did not completely believe or understand the full ramifications of the "Fina

l Solution" when they first heard about it?
History
2 answers:
Lerok [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The reason why Allied leaders did not completely believe or understand the full ramifications of the “Final Solution” when they first heard about it was that they could not believe Hitler would go along with such a horrific plan and have the support from the people. They did not think the Jews were to blame for everything, and thought that Hitler’s plan was crazy.

gizmo_the_mogwai [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

They did not believe that someone could do something so horrible.

You might be interested in
If both houses _____ the bill, it goes to the ____?
Alik [6]
If both houses deny the bill, it goes to the Supreme Court.
6 0
3 years ago
What is the 3 consequences of incumbency advantages for democratic election
makvit [3.9K]
One of the main advantages of incumbency for a democratic election is that the people are used to the incumbent, another would be that the incumbent usually has more money, and other would be that they are used to campaigning. 
4 0
2 years ago
Place the following events in the order they occurred
Arturiano [62]

Answer: Hitler and Stalin signed a nonaggression pact, Germany invaded Poland, Britain and France declared war on Germany, Poland surrendered

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Who would win french or british
Airida [17]

Answer:

french

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do the values expressed on the 1956 campaign button compare to the values expressed on the 2008 button? Do you consider all
Valentin [98]

Answer:

The buttons of the campaign for president of the United States in 1956, when Dwight Eisenhower was elected, expressed a notion of continuity. One of the buttons said: "Don´t change the team in the middle of the stream".

On the other hand, the button of campaign in 2008, when Barack Obama was chosen as US president, had a message of change, for instance: "Hope wins" and "Change we can believe in".

The slogans of both campaigns refer to democratic values although the messages of the 2008 campaign hava a more optimistic sense.  

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one reason for president mckinleys re election in 1900?
    8·2 answers
  • During the 189os, many American farmers tried
    10·2 answers
  • Why did Reagan have the United stars invade Grenada
    12·1 answer
  • Will this quiz be on US history only?
    10·1 answer
  • Why was Maysville Road Veto a key aspect of Jackson’s presidency?
    14·2 answers
  • How might you create an account of an event that happened hundreds of years before
    7·1 answer
  • What did Martin's wife do after his death?
    12·2 answers
  • Hi abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the southern colonies
    13·1 answer
  • Pretend you are a soldier in the Continental Army. Write a letter to your parent about life in Valley Forge. The letter should b
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!