The difference is that the founding fathers claimed that freedom is a right for all men and the old south didn't take slaves to be people. For the southerners, every slave was only 3/5ths of a man, so they weren't people and therefore they couldn't have their freedom and the constitution did not apply to them. That is why slavery lasted as long as it did, because people fought abolishing slavery.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The others work in either a different branch of the federal govt (B and C) and D doesn't work in the federal gov't AT ALL
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The Indian fight for independence from the British empire received such strong support not only in India but from other countries, for teh fact that its leader, Mahatma Gandhi, decided to base the Indian Independence movement on non-violent acts.
So we can say that a big part of the success of the movement was due to the non-violence approach and tactics of its leaders.
As happened in the past, if a violent approach would have been taken, the English king could easily have sent soldiers and special troops to quickly ending with any fight or rebellion. So Gandhi really knew that a war was not a real option and many Indians could have died on the battlefield with not a real chance of winning the war.
So the nonviolent approach was the smartest decision he could have made.
to my information the zhou over threw the shangs from power. teh zhou was a feudal system run country
Answer:
for part A, it the last one about the pen. For part B, its the second to last one about her reflecting. hope this helps :)
Explanation:
