A government nor religion should control the people's lives. Religion is for enlightenment of the soul and shouldn't control the lives of its worshippers. From the 16th century to the 19th century, the Catholic Church would control its worshipper through fear in England and would draw out money in the process. A religion might dangle predestination in front of the noses of its worshippers and violate human rights by saying it was meant to be. Governments that control its people's lives are usually authoritarian and probably have committed many human rights violations. The worst that could happen with this is a combination of controlling churches and governments; Religious-based Governments. Religious-based countries may follow a doctorine set within the religion and might cause oppression among the population.
The government should not control people religion, only religion can control someone life because that’s them deviating there lives to God and Jesus. So when the government says no bible, no hijabs or anything religious it hurts others because they are spreading the truth and man kind is afraid of the truth.
Over the next decade textiles was the dominant industry in the country, with hundreds of companies created. Eli Whitney's development of the interchangeable part began by revolutionizing the arms industry, but ended up transforming the face of manufacturing in the United States.
Southern states wanted new slave territories, while the north wanted to contain the spread of slavery. while western expansion contributed to growing sectional tensions between the north and south from 1800-1820
The problem with a balanced- budget amendment is that it would, in a sense , require active fiscal policy — but in the wrong direction —as the economy slides into recession.
