1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir1956 [14]
3 years ago
8

According to Erikson, what will an individual who fails to master the maturational crisis of adolescence most often do?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Tju [1.3M]3 years ago
4 0

Erikson's main idea of what happens if you do not master the conflict of a given age (the equivalent of a Freudian fixation) is identity crisis. Each conflict has two parts: the successful outcome one wants, and the negative outcome which comes from failing to master the conflict. Tye conflict of adolescence is identity vs confusion. If one should fail to master this conflict, they will be confused as to who they are, will not feel like they fit in, and will waver between varying personality types in an effort to discover their identity.

You might be interested in
Which are beliefs shared by nearly all muslims?
creativ13 [48]
I'm  Muslim 
1. Muslims must not eat pork
2. Muslims must not be violent against other muslims
3. Muslims must fast on ramadan if able
<span>4.Muslims must say 5 prayers every day if able
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP DO NOT WASTE ANSWERS URGENT WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

I think that it is 1     3     and 4    

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Recall that burgess and wallin (1953) studied the personality characteristics of hundreds of engaged couples. specifically, they
Ugo [173]
...more similar to each other on demographic, physical and personality characteristics
3 0
2 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
1 year ago
Brigido Guerrero's life was spared at the Alamo because he convinced Santa Anna he had been a prisoner and forced to fight...
kherson [118]

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

I hope this helps blease pick me for brainliest

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In a caste system, status is determined by birth and is lifelong. <br> a. True<br> b. False
    7·1 answer
  • ____ is defined as a total way of life held in common by a group of people who share similarities in speech, behavior, ideology,
    10·1 answer
  • Throughout its history, Japan's greatest economic challenge has been its A) technological limits. B) education of its people. C)
    7·2 answers
  • Which Persian king's reign was between the reigns of Artaxerxes and Darius?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these laws was created in order to directly protect consumers?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain the impact of social inequality on politics in argentina
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the Egyptians call their king pharaoh? A. The Egyptians borrowed the title from the Sumerians. B. The king wore the Doub
    6·2 answers
  • In 5-7 complete sentences, describe the fall of Constantinople and explain why it is considered one of the most important events
    10·1 answer
  • Which activity describes an application of topographic maps? Check all that apply.
    9·1 answer
  • Which group first promoted the idea that drug use could remedy feelings of alienation?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!