Answer:
Roll call vote, voice vote ( yea or nay) , and standing vote
Explanation:
One narrative technique for consolidating the gains a client makes involves a therapist writing letters to the person. this is documenting the evidence.Basically, the externalization of a problem consists in the linguistic separation of the problem of the personal identity of the client.In recent years, therapists around the world have begun to evaluate the narrative approach, reducing the weight of the traditional client-therapist relationship and treating the concept of personal identity as a fluid social construction. The appeal of this Narrative Therapy goes beyond the technique, since it represents a fundamental change of direction in the therapeutic world that has been called the Third Wave.
The big difference is that the French were very kind to the Native Americans, while the Spanish were pretty harsh, forcing them into Christianity. I don't really know any similarities except maybe trading.
Hope this helps!
Determinism is the idea that free will is an illusion and that our behavior is governed by internaland external forces over which we have no control; consequently, our behavior is viewed as predictable. Hard determinism is the view that forces outside of our control have complete authority over behavior, however soft determinism opposes this view and suggests that we are constrained by these forces, but only to an extent as there is an element of free will in behavior.
Tina and Tom are co-workers at Acme Corporation. As night custodians, they work together cleaning the Acme office building at night when the building is empty. Tom regularly makes sexual advances toward Tina that distress her. However, Tina has never complained-The statement that holds accurate is (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it</u>
Explanation:
Since ,Tina and Tom are co-workers and they also work together as night custodian .If Tina has some problem with the sexual advances /behavior made tom then she should immediately complain about the same to her immediate supervisor ,But in the case above Tina has not made any complain towards the harassment act of tom .
so,the answer (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it </u>holds True
