Explanation:
hang on 1 second I will edit this in 1 second
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy differed from that of Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft by its emphasis on neutrality.
United States President Woodrow Wilson tried to maintain a foreign policy of neutrality. This was more emphatic at the beginning of World War I. He did not want to intervene in the issues of Europe.
However, everything changed when the US government intercepted the Zimmerman telegram, in which the Germans asked México for help in the war. Another thing that happened at that time, the Germans sank the Lusitania ship. After these events, President Wilson asked the US Congress for a declaration of war against Germany.
To be honest all of these answers are wrong (for being the main reason)
<span>When in 1931 Japan invaded Manchuria, Great Britain and France, the only League members at the time with significant regional ‘clout’, proved unwilling and would perhaps in any case have been unable to impose effective sanctions on the aggressor. Next, in 1935, Italy invaded Abyssinia in whose fate no other great power had any direct interest. This, it was widely recognised, was the decisive test case for the League. For Great Britain and France clearly did on this occasion have the capacity to defeat Italy if matters came to an all-out war. But in neither London nor Paris was there sufficient support for the imposition of anything more vigorous than partial economic sanctions (which themselves were lifted in 1936). The British cabinet was satisfied that they could not risk the loss of even part of their fleet in a war with Italy at a time when their possessions in the Far East were thought to be menaced by Japan and when the US administration was seen to be hamstrung by congressional neutrality legislation. Similarly, the French held that war with Italy for the sake of Abyssinia would be quixotic at a time when all French forces were thought to be needed for a possible early showdown with Nazi Germany. Abyssinia was accordingly incorporated into the Italian empire in 1936. As a body for resisting international aggression the League had thus effectively perished. It continued to exist in a moribund condition until the end of the Second World War when it was formally replaced by the United Nations.
</span>
If this is multiple choice then just go with B)
<span>Laws instituted by Draco in 621 BC were unpopular with the majority of Athenians. The premier Archon of the time then changed the laws to be in favor of citizens. It was also changed so that any land owning male could become an Archon.</span>
I think the best answer would be “a desire to erase traces
of British colonial influence”
Indian returned to purely Indian named places started in
1947 and is still continually happening right now. Locals still call the names of some places as
to the original name such as Mumbai; locals call it Bombay also with the presence
of Bombay High Court.
