Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
Answer:
The will of the majority (or overall society) cannot be used to deprive right sot an individual or a member of a minority group.
A presidential veto happens when the president withholds his mark from a bill introduced to him, after it has been passed by both places of Congress, and returns it to Congress (particularly, to the place of starting point), alongside his protests to the bill.
Important choices or choices with consequences I believe so
Answer: The Outback
Explanation: Mark me as the brainliest