What do people think of freedom of speech?

History

1 answer:

Softa [21]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Freedom of Speech is one of the fundamental rights provided to the citizens of India. It allows the citizens of our country to express their ideas and share their opinions freely. It allows the general public as well as the media to comment on any of the political activities and even show discontentment against the ones they find inappropriate.

Just like India many other countries also provide the Freedom of Speech and Expression to its citizens but with some limitations. The restrictions put on the Freedom of Speech vary from country to country. There are also many countries that do not allow this basic human right. The general public and the media in such countries are refrained from commenting on the activities carried out by the government. Criticism of government, political parties or ministers is a punishable offense in such countries.

While Freedom of Speech is essential for the overall growth of the society it may have certain negative repercussions too. People must not use it to disrespect or instigate others. The media must also act responsibly and not misuse the Freedom of Speech.

I am lucky to have born in India – a country that respects its citizens and provides them with all the rights that are needed for their growth and development.

You might be interested in

You are researching the US involvement in the Vietnam War. You find a web site that contains several advertisements for travel,

ivanzaharov [21]

B. The purpose of the site is to provide information on military uniforms worn in the Vietnam War.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now

Rzqust [24]

I believe the answer is C

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

in the text the author discusses some of the ways the first amendment has been interpreted. in the context of our current americ

NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

This question is really geared more towards your own interpretation, so there isn't necessarily going to be a right or wrong answer. I would say that today the first amendment protects when people are speaking out against policies and general injustices in the American society today, and for instance, on social media I have seen people say "f trump and f america." The first amendment is protecting them, so that nobody can hold that statement against them and press charges. If we lived in russia, the russian secret police would find you, and kill you for that. Personally, I believe that if someone wanted to burn an american flag on their front lawn, and curse america, they should not be protected by the first amendment. that should be a crime. However, the first amendment does protect them, so there is nothing anyone could do about that legally.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Which two internal citations for a book version of Helen Keller’s memoir are correct? “But Miss Sullivan did not arrive until th

aniked [119]

Answer:B And D

Explanation:

I did the thing and both were right

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Was the sit-in movement similar to protests in recent times? please guys help me out!

sergey [27]

Answer:

yes because the sit-in is a type of seated position demonstration it also consists in occupying a space on the public highway, in a public building or a private establishment and in staying there for a determined time or as long as possible until forced evacuation

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers