Answer:
Authoritarian rule can be or cannot be legitimate because existence of pure legitimacy is not possible
Explanation:
The legitimacy represents outspoken public loyalty and conformist mentality of a individual /group/organization which shapes the repressive administrative machinery to be of a high developed nature. This is not possible in authoritarian regimes which leverage to facilitate certain sects of the society like elite group.
However, in current time pure legitimacy is also not possible hence the concept of authoritative legitimacy is arising.
Answer:
b. The source us not credible because it contains more opinions than facts.
Explanation:
Hello!
Hitler's goal was to establish a New Order based on the absolute hegemony of Nazi Germany on the European continent. Its foreign and domestic policy had the objective of seizing Lebensraum ('vital space') for the Germanic peoples. It promoted the rearmament of Germany, for which Hitler pressed Austria for unification with Germany and this was followed by the intensification of the Sudeten crisis, in the German-speaking area of Czechoslovakia known as Sudetenland; This led to the Munich Agreement of September 1938, which authorized the annexation and immediate military occupation of these districts by Germany. Under these plans it could be said that the Nazi party has acted by attacking and occupying other territories. Hitler believed that Nazi Germany should demonstrate its superiority, which is why it had to fight to establish its hegemonic power in Europe.
I hope this helps!
regards
One of Ataturk's reforms in Turkey was to reject Religion in laws and government
Answer Choice B.
