Answer:
Piercing the corporate veil
Explanation:
This are the options that come with this question:
- hiding behind the corporate skirt.
- whistleblowing.
- piercing the corporate veil.
- limited liability.
This is an example of the doctrine of "piercing the corporate veil." This describes a situation in which the shareholders of a corporation can be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of a corporation, according to a court. This is in contrast to common practice in corporations, which assumes that, if a corporation is sued, the shareholders cannot be brought into the lawsuit. "Piercing the corporate veil" usually occurs in the case of fraud, or in the case of egregious and willful activity that put corporate gain over the public good.
Answer:
B. The U.S. sold Europe goods needed during the war and took over some markets completely
Explanation:
"The total value of U.S. exports grew from $2.4 billion in 1913 to $6.2 billion in 1917. Most of that went to major Allied powers like Great Britain, France, and Russia, which scrambled to secure American cotton, wheat, brass, rubber, automobiles, machinery, wheat, and thousand of other raw and finished goods." - Heather Michon
Answer:
A. Confirmation Bias
Explanation:
Confirmation bias is a type of cognitive bias whereby a person tend to favour ideas, concepts, information or things that is in line. or which confirms his existing belief or conviction.
An individual who consciously downplays the importance of a rejected system and ignores the negative side of the system bought is showing signs of confirmation bias.
<span>The apartheid system in South Africa was an example of legal discrimination is true.
so your answer is </span>a. true
hope that helps
Answer:
Co-regulation
Explanation:
In psychology, co-regulation parenting is defined as a parent's support of their children emotional development through motivational or emotional scaffolding, helping their children regulate their behavior and emotions.
In co-regulation, each participant regulates the behavior of the other so it's a two-way process. This process is also continuous and dynamic as the response of one participant regulates the behavior of the other one.
In this example, <u>Angie is free to schedule her study and relaxation time </u>on her own. Angie's mom, on the other side, <u>checks on her school progress and talks to her about her problems and social life</u>.
We can see that <u>Angie's mom is supporting Angie's development by scaffolding, regulating her behavior (study and relaxation time) and emotions (talking about her problems)</u>. Angie's mom give her enough freedom to regulate herself but she also checks on her and is there for her to talk about her needs and problems. Thus, this is an example of co-regulation parenting.
