Answer:
C- Sale of land for cash.
Explanation:
Since, cash would be generated from the sale, and it would be invested in buying something else like stocks or an asset, It would be included in the portion of investing activity in the cash flow statement.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Owning a share means you own a percentage of the company.
Explanation:
A share which is also called a stock is a <em>corporate or financial asset ownership unit</em>. Owning some shares in the business entitles the holder to a proportionate amount of the company's profits. Profits are called dividends when they are paid to shareholders.
Answer:
The business judgement rule states that if the board takes decision in good faith and in best interest of the corporation considering the information available then its decision is not to be questioned by the courts. The courts can intervene only if there is any breach of good faith, due care or loyalty.
The above case is similar in facts with another case paramount vs time. In that case Time decided to merge with another company named Warner. Paramount also started bidding for Time but the directors of Time rejected their bid offer citing that warner merger would be more suitable for the company strategy.
Paramount then brought the case against Time in court.The court stated that the instant case was different from another case (REVLON VS MacAndrews) where Revlon was up for sale and hence it was necessary for the board to sell its assets to the highest bidder.
Answer:
Option B, Jamal is entitled to revoke acceptance because he took back the motorcycle after the seller's assurance that the nonconformity would be cured.
Explanation:
The primary purpose of purchasing goods is to obtain conforming goods of the desired quality. Occasionally, the seller delivers non-conforming goods, goods that fail to meet the contractual obligation (obligations include: seller's description, statements promises...). In situations like this the buyer may revoke his acceptance if already accepted or reject the delivery upon discovery.
If delivery is already accepted, acceptance may be revoked;
* On the reasonable grounds that its non-conformity would be cured and it has not be cured.
* Without discovery of such non-conformity if his acceptance was reasonably induced either by the difficulty of delivery before acceptance or by the seller's assurances.
Therefore, option B best suits the question. Under these circumstances, Jamal is entitled to revoke his acceptance because the he took back the motorcycle after the seller's assurance that the non-conformity would be cured which was not, even after several complaints.
