1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paraphin [41]
3 years ago
12

What are the underlying reasons for the law to continue to make distinctions between real and personal property, intangible and

tangible property
Business
1 answer:
kap26 [50]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

In trying to made distinction between the real and personal property as the law provided, there is need to define both terms.

Real properties are those properties that can not be move from one place to another, I.e, they are immovable. Example of such property is land and the building constructed on it or agricultural practices on a particular land. In some textbooks, they are regarded as fixed asset such as a manufacturing plants which are in most cases not likely to be removable after the foundation as been laid due to the heaviness of the machines.

While

Personal property are those properties that are movable and example of such is money.

So, in both properties, the nature of use and level of controls the owner have over them differs and that is why the law provided specific rules and regulations over their ownership, possession and or transferrability. As for Real Properties, the law is very strict about it since it is a rigid property and its transferrability requires deed of agreement which much must be signed by witnesses from all parties involves and registered at the deed registry. The law also provides very strict tax regulations on landed property. As for the personal property, the regulation on it is less compare to that of real since it's movable and can be asset by the owner at any time and transfer of ownership is flexible. So, the law will continue to make distinction between these two types of property as they requires different regulations and their level of control differs.

Also for the tangible and intangible property, the law will continue to make distinction between them since one can be seen and the other can't.

Tangible properties are those properties that can be seen, touch, and physically acquired or taken into possession. Example is land, Building or workshop, Automobile. e.t.c

While,

Intangible properties are those properties that can not seen physically but exist on papers. Their impact can only be felt. Example of such properties are intellectual properties that are backed by copyrights, Academic presentations protected from plagiarism, checks and certificates of deposits.

From their definition, it is important to state that law will continue to make distinction between them since the control of ownership differs.

You might be interested in
The most efficient way to ensure that producers are responsible for products is through
forsale [732]

Answer:

labeling

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
As a current or future business owner, entrepreneurs need to be able to assess collateral in order to secure a possible
amm1812

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Collateral is an asset used as a guarantee or security for the payment of a loan. It assures the lender that a borrower will pay back the loan.

If an entrepreneur applies for a business loan, the bank will most likely demand collateral. The entrepreneur will need to offer an asset, either property or motor vehicle, that will act as a guarantee for the loan. Should the entrepreneur fail in repayment, the bank can sell the asset to recover their money.

Few, if any, will lend anyone money based on a business idea alone.  Many banks will demand a business proposal to be backed with some guarantee to secure funding.

3 0
3 years ago
A characteristic of search firms known as headhunters is that they: question 6 options:
omeli [17]
A characteristic of search firms known as headhunters is that they <span>specialize in recruiting employees for entry-level jobs. A headhunter is another name for a recruiter, in which they look for people that would fit entry level jobs and recruit them for businesses. They work as a third party between the employer and potential hirer. They get paid if the people they find fit the description of what the company wants and their person receives the job. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Suppose on Friday night you have a choice to go either to a Katy Perry concert or a Lady Gaga concert. You won a free ticket to
VMariaS [17]

Answer: $100

Explanation:

From the information, on a Friday night, you have the choice to either go to a Katy Perry concert or a Lady Gaga concert. You won a free ticket to see Katy Perry but you would pay as much as $180 to see Lady Gaga perform, even thought the tickets to her show cost $100.

This illustrates that the person must be willing to pay at least $100 to see Katy Perry. Since the person wa.willing to pay $180 for Lady Gaga even when the tickets were$100, then you should be able to pay at least $100 to see Perry

4 0
3 years ago
The tragedy of the commons occurs because
kow [346]
<span>c. common resources are rival in consumption. In the tragedy of the commons, William Forster Lloyd presented the example of a common resource being over used and destroyed because for any individual abusing the resource, they gained a benefit while the damage to the resource was paid by everyone. So let's look at the available options and see what makes sense, or doesn't make sense. a. people consider the value of resources in the future more than in the present. * If this were true, the there wouldn't be a tragedy of the commons. So this is an incorrect answer. b. markets do not account for the presence of property rights. * The tragedy of the commons doesn't involve property rights. EVERYONE in the community is allowed to use the commons. The problem is irresponsible overuse of the common resource. So this is also an incorrect answer. c. common resources are rival in consumption. * This is the correct answer. The concept of Rivalry is where a common resource can not be simultaneous consumed by multiple users, or if the consumption of a resource decreases its utility to another consumer. In the tragedy, if one person grazes (consumes) more than their fair share, the commons gets over grazed and over time stops producing. Each person who's overgrazing does get a tangible short term benefit for doing so, but everyone has to pay the cost. d. government does not efficiently allocate society's scarce resources. * This is also a wrong answer. It's true that the commons could be regulated by the government, but then it would no longer be the commons.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Chris, a manager, knows that one of his employees values achievement and power. Chris should assign the employee to a job that
    10·1 answer
  • On May 2, 1990 SAFE BANK discussed the possibility of loaning Tyler Corp. $500,000. Tyler signed a security agreement and UCC-1
    9·1 answer
  • An employee earns $5,750 per month working for an employer. The FICA tax rate for Social Security is 6.2% of the first $128,400
    7·1 answer
  • Why does the free-market system bring efficiency as well as freedom?
    14·1 answer
  • Skymont Company wants an ending inventory each month equal to 30% of that month's cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold for Feb
    8·1 answer
  • Shamrock Company had net income of $34,000. The weighted-average common shares outstanding were 8,500. The company declared a $3
    9·1 answer
  • Consider a firm that has fixed costs of $300. The firm also faces a marginal cost of $600 for producing the first unit of output
    6·1 answer
  • What is different between administration and management?
    8·1 answer
  • *will award Brainliest to whoever gives the correct answer!*
    10·2 answers
  • QUESTION ONE Suppose Genesis chooses between spending his money on soccer matches at Ndola stadium and on watching movies. With
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!