Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
Order winners are those products that customers recognize of having the minimum requirements so they can consider to purchase them and that are better than their competitors eventually making consumers buy them. Thus, firms must keep core competencies aligned to the customers' order winners.
Answer: 75 days
Explanation:
The total customer-response time (CRT), will be calculated as:
Order received by the manufacturing department = 15 days
Add: Order put into production = 20 days
Add: Processing time = 25 days
Add: Shipping Time = 15 days
Total customer response time = 75 days
Answer:
Benefits from related & unrelated diversification.
Explanation:
Firms' benefit(s) from related diversification :
- Building & developing market power - By sharing the related diversification going on in entire industry.
- Sharing activities & market linkages with other businesses - Associated diversification implies forward & backward linkages.
Firms' benefit(s) from unrelated diversification :
- Leveraging & enhancing different core competencies, USP - By Focusing on self paced unique diversification
- Creating a different ostentation brand - Creating a strong brand, capable of becoming a market leader, rather than market follower
Key concepts explaining firm success or failure from either diversification are implicit within above explanation.
Answer:
The amount of investment should be $1926.891 approximately
<u>Explanation:</u>
The following formula has been used to calculate the amount of investment
A = P(1+r/100) ^n
where: A = future value
, P = present value
, R = rate of interest
, N = time period
Hence
, applying the formula, we get,
$5500 = P (1+6/100) ^18
Hence P=$5500/ (1.06) ^18
=$1926.891(approx)
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that the name Coke was so well known around the world, that it is effectively a common term for the trademarked Coca Cola. If other companies try to use similar terms like Koke for other types of products, e.g. bakery items, there is a risk that the Coca Cola company would be negatively affected by that product's image since consumers might associate Koke directly to Coca Cola.
It doesn't matter if the products were low quality or not, the courts cannot determine that, what matters is that the use of the term may negatively impact another company.