The first thing Karen and Anika should do is to understand the position of competitors by using the positioning process.
<h3>What is positioning?</h3>
The process of positioning refers to the establishment of a business and its products in the market by creating awareness about it. This product positioning helps to create an image of the products among customers.
This product positioning helps the consumers to compare the product with competitors and identify the product with brand value. It also helps to recognize our products with similar products available in the market.
Therefore, Karen and Anika need to understand the position of their competitors if they wanted to provide their services in a market that has already startups and firms.
This helps them to settle the unique value of their products among customers after recognizing the value of competitors' products.
Learn more about positioning, here:
brainly.com/question/14774463
#SPJ1
$480 would be your answer because the fair value per share $8 x 60 mil = $480 the $480 mil total compensation is expensed equally over the three-year vesting period reducing earnings by $160 million each year :D
Answer:
The answer is a. Market value per share is the price at which a stock is bought and sold.
Explanation:
For shares that are listed in the stock exchange, the market value per share is the price of share at which share is currently traded. In other words, this is the fair value of the share and at this price, share can be readily sold or bought.
(b) is not correct because it describes the commitment (usually made by an investment bank) to purchase newly issued shares at predetermined price when those shares are not purchased by other investors in the market.
(c) describes a type of stock rather than the definition of market value per share.
(d) describes Preemptive right rather than the definition of market value per share.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A currency appreciates when its value increases.
For example if $1 was exchanged for 50 pesos. After appreciation of the pesos, $1 would buy $25 pesos.
So more $2 would be needed to buy 50 peso after the appreciation when before the appreciation $1 was buying 50 pesos.
As a result Mexican goods would become more expensive to US consumers and the revenue earned by Mexican producers would increase
