<span>The effect the fierce competition among industrial nations had globally was that it altered patterns of world trade.</span>
Both the cases, Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, involved interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court decided that racial discrimination in accommodations was permissible. After 58 years, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. The Board of Education of Topeka (1954) that racial accommodations were fundamentally unfair and therefore unconstitutional.
The Plessy v. Ferguson ruling, which sanctioned the "separate but equal" practises, was overturned by the Brown decision, making it a significant legal precedent. According to the Plessy decision's interpretation of the 14th Amendment, segregated facilities might be used to achieve legal equality.
Know more about Plessy v. Ferguson here
brainly.com/question/12846797
#SPJ4
I think it is D mild I am just guessing.
Answer: It is a belief of profitable trading known as commercialism.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, the government can take her property.
Explanation:
The government can take Nancy's property because it has eminent domain over the property. In other words, it means that the government can take private property and make it a public giving the owner compensation for the land. Besides, there has to be a public purpose for the eminent domain over the plot; which, could be the construction of roads, railroads, or public buildings.
