Not available for individual investors hola
Answer: The court shouldn't grant either of them motion, due to the fact that the jury must determine whether the damage was due to the technician's installation of the improper cooling panel.
Explanation:
Based on the information given and assuming that both parties have moved for a directed verdict, then the court should not grant either of the motions.
The court shouldn't grant either of them motion, due to the fact that the jury must determine whether the damage was due to the technician's installation of the improper cooling panel.
Answer:
The question is incomplete. However, kindly find below the complete version of the question:
Question
Jack and Diane own Enviromax, a monopolistically competitive firm that recycles paper products. (1.)If Enviromax wants to maximize profit, what price would they charge? (2).What is their profit per unit if they are operating at the profit maximizing output?
Answer / Explanation
(1) First before we continue to answer this question, let us define what a monopoly is: This is a kind of market situation where the sole production or manufacturing of a product have been given to a single entity.
The graph attached below will give us a proper understanding and illustration of the answer.
Where: MR in the graph is defined as the additional revenue obtained when producers produce 1 more unit of good and the AR refers to the total revenue divided by the amount of output produced which is essentially the price of one unit of good.
MC refers to the additional cost incurred by producers when they produce 1 more unit of good and is upwards sloping due to increasing opportunity costs of production.
Noting that since the firm is a monopolistic type, the MR curve is lower than the AR curve because if the firm wants to sell an additional unit of output it will have to lower the successive price. This is unlike the case of a firm operating in a PC where it takes the price as given and hence has no ability to set prices. it should also be noted that profit maximizing for all firms (whether PC or non-PC) occurs at MC=MR. This is because if MC>MR this means the additional cost of producing this unit of good > additional revenue obtained from selling this unit of good and is hence not profit maximizing. If MC<MR, this implies that the firm should not stop at producing this unit of good because it will be forgoing the additional net revenue (profit) should it do so. Hence all firms will produce at the point where MC=MR.
(2) Now referring back to the graph, the profit-maximising point where MC intersects MR hence occurs at output Q. The firm will hence produce Q and hence price at P according to the AR (DD) curve.
In the graph below, since AR > AC at the profit maximizing level, this implies that per unit revenue >
per unit costs and the firm makes a supernormal profit (defined as what excess profit above what is needed to keep firms in production which is normal profit) of the shaded area. If the firm was operating in a perfectly competitive market however, then the profit maximizing point would occur at AR =MC (since AR=MR in a PC market) and the firm would be producing at Qpc and Ppc
Answer: (C) Zanda will have higher inventory carrying costs.
Explanation:
The inventory carrying cost is one of the type of overall holding inventory cost that helps in identifying the various types of business expenses and also storing the various types of unsold goods and the services in the market.
The inventory carrying cost is also known as the holding cost and it is basically responsible for handling the cost system by using the estimated formula.
According to the given question, Zanda corporation is basically using the level production plan for the purpose identifying their business factors such as costs, demand and the products.
So, based on the given information is Zanda will have the high inventory carrying cost statement is true. Therefore, Option (C) is correct answer.
Answer:
The answer is: psychological contract
Explanation:
Psychological contracts are the expectations or promises exchanged between the parties; employer, employee, or even fellow employees, in an employment relationship. They are not written contracts, but they often implicit or understood between the parties. For example, an employee expects that if he or she works really hard, eventually he or she will receive a promotion or a salary raise.