We need to find an inequality that represents the possible landing or take of conditions of an aircraft, the required graph and one case where the inequality will be tested.
The required inequality is
.
The graph represents the allowable temperature range in which the aircraft can takeoff or land.
The pilot could not have taken off on June 1990, the temperature in Phoenix, Arizona.
Let the temperature be denoted by 
The temperature cannot be at or below
, so

The temperature cannot be at or above
, so

The inequality will be
.
In the graph it can be seen that all points between -40 and 118 falls in the shaded region but it will exclude the points -40 and 118.
The graph represents the allowable temperature range in which the aircraft can takeoff or land.
The temperature in June 1990 in Phoenix, Arizona was
which is more than
.
Hence, the pilot could not have taken off on this day.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/20383699
brainly.com/question/11612965
<span>A value is in the domain if there is a point on the graph of the function at that x-value</span>
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Both expressions are examples of the <em>distributive property</em>, which basically says "if I have <em>this </em>many groups of some size and <em>that</em> many groups of the same size, I've got <em>this </em>+ <em>that</em> groups of that size altogether."
To give an example, if I've got <em>3 groups of 5 </em>and <em>2 groups of 5</em>, I've got 3 + 2 = <em>5 groups of 5 </em>in total. I've attached a visual from Math with Bad Drawings to illustrate this idea.
Mathematically, we'd capture that last example with the equation
. We can also read that in reverse: 3 + 2 groups of 5 is the same as adding together 3 groups of 5 and 2 groups of 5; both directions get us 8 groups of 5. We can use this fact to rewrite the first expression like this:
.
This idea extends to subtraction too: If we have 3 groups of 4 and we take away 1 group of 4, we'd expect to be left with 3 - 1 = 2 groups of 4, or in symbols:
. When we start with two numbers like 15 and 10, our first question should be if we can split them up into groups of the same size. Obviously, you could make 15 groups of 1 and 10 groups of 1, but 15 is also the same as <em>3 groups of 5</em> and 10 is the same as <em>2 groups of 5</em>. Using the distributive property, we could write this as
, so we can say that
.
Answer:
1/10
Step-by-step explanation:
Julie read 5/10 in the morning and had 4/10 left to read after what she read at night. At night, she read ...
1 - 1/2 -2/5 = 10/10 -5/10 -4/10 = 1/10
Julie read 1/10 of the book at night.