Exponential functions are related to logarithmic functions in that they are inverse functions. Exponential functions move quickly up towards a [y] infinity, bounded by a vertical asymptote (aka limit), whereas logarithmic functions start quick but then taper out towards an [x] infinity, bounded by a horizontal asymptote (aka limit).
If we use the natural logarithm (ln) as an example, the constant "e" is the base of ln, such that:
ln(x) = y, which is really stating that the base (assumed "e" even though not shown), that:
if we try to solve for y in this form it's nearly impossible, that's why we stick with ln(x) = y
but to find the inverse of the form:
switch the x and y, then solve for y:
So the exponential function is the inverse of the logarithmic one, f(x) = ln x
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
Please write: "Determine whether y+x=1 shows direct variation."
No, it does not, because of the constant term, 1.
If we were to eliminate the 1 and write y + x = 0, then yes, this would represent direct variation.
Answer:
first one is not. parallel second one is not and the third one is
Answer:
yes, they are
Step-by-step explanation:
3;5 = 6;10