The first bomb, dropped on the city of Hiroshima on 6 August 1945, resulted in a death toll of around 135,000. The second, which hit Nagasaki on 9 August, killed at least 50,000 people – according to some estimates, as many as 74,000 died.<span>It was certainly a reasonable view for the USA to take, since they had suffered the loss of more than 418,000 lives, both military and civilian. To the top rank of the US military the 135,000 death toll was worth it to prevent the “many thousands of American troops [that] would be killed in invading Japan” – a view attributed to the president himself.</span><span>the US wasn’t justified. Even secretary of war Henry Lewis Stimson was not sure the bombs were needed to reduce the need of an invasion: “Japan had no allies; its navy was almost destroyed; its islands were under a naval blockade; and its cities were undergoing concentrated air attacks.”</span><span>The atom bombs achieved their desired effects by </span>causing maximum devastation<span>. Just six days after the Nagasaki bombing, the Emperor’s Gyokuon-hōsō speech was broadcast to the nation, detailing the Japanese surrender. The devastation caused by the bombs sped up the Japanese surrender, which was the best solution for all parties.</span>
Answer:
Balance accounts
.
Explanation:
The policy of balancing public accounts is not part of the group of monetary policy measures, but rather of the group of fiscal policies. That is, the balancing of accounts implies that expenditures are limited in certain areas of the government, with the objective of reducing the fiscal deficit and thus promoting economic collection by the government in order to guarantee the stability of the public accounts.
Answer: Islam first came to West Africa as a slow and peaceful process, spread by Muslim traders and scholars. The early journeys across the Sahara were done in stages. Goods passed through chains of Muslim traders, purchased, finally, by local non-Muslims at the southern most end of the route.
Explanation:
Bartolomé de las casas in a very brief account of the destruction of the indies in 1552 argued that the depopulation of the Native American populations is on Spanish brutality rather than on the spread of disease.
<h3>What is the message of destruction of the Indies?</h3>
This is an account written by the Bartolomé de las Casas in 1542 about the atrocities committed against the indigenous peoples of the Americas in colonial times which was sent to then Prince Philip II of Spain.
In general, the account was written to persuade the Spanish king to act in response to the Spanish conquistadors' abuse of the indigenous population. Some critics argue that facts and figures about the mistreatment and death toll were exaggerated.
In conclusion, the brief account of the destruction of the indies in 1552 argued that the depopulation of the Native American populations is on Spanish brutality rather than on the spread of disease.
Read more about destruction of the indies
brainly.com/question/10385570
#SPJ1
Answer:
modern era has technological advancements. it also has advanced in medicine.
