NO. they are not. Nothing in this question or sentences make sense to a linear pair.
The answer is c mean = median
Answer:
The null and alternative hypothesis are:

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean tornado length is greater than 2.6 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the provided information.
The claim that the mean tornado length is greater than 2.6 miles.
If there is no statistical significance in the test then it is know as the null which is denoted by
, otherwise it is known as alternative hypothesis which denoted by
.
Therefore, the required null and alternative hypothesis are:

significance level α =0.05
From the given table the test statistic T=2.230166
P-value is 0.0131
0.0131<0.05
P value is less than the significance level, so reject the null hypothesis.
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean tornado length is greater than 2.6 miles
Set up a ratio comparing the sample portion to the whole portion.
x= # of all dogs likely to have chip
Sample: 8 out of 50
Whole: x out of 2,300
8/50= x/2300
cross multiply
(50*x)= (8*2300)
50x= 18400
divide both sides by 50
x= 368
ANSWER: 368 dogs in Clarkson are likely to have a microchip.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
1 6 15 20 15 6 1
Step-by-step explanation:
To figure this out, we need to look at Pascal's Triangle, which is a tricky little way to find the coefficients for any binomial expression like this! Check the attached photo.
Because this is to the sixth, we need the 6th row, which is <u>1 6 15 20 15 6 1.</u> From this, we know that those numbers are the coefficients!