Answer:
Which of the following is most likely to be true?
A
Explanation:
A) It will be difficult to find a rent-controlled apartment in Albany or Halftrack; rents for the Halftrack apartments not subject to controls will be higher than they would be without rent control
Answer:
The statement is false
Explanation:
Non- essential expense is the expense which is spent on the extra things, which means it is not essential to meet the needs. Whereas the essential expense are those expenses which are spend on consuming the things required for living. For example food, cloth.
So, both the expenses are those expense which are necessary for an individual or person and therefore, cannot be reduced in order to produce the more savings.
The cycle of money where it results to profits for business
and salaries for workers are when we pay money for the services or things that
we buy and this ends when we receive the items and services we need. Cash
conversion is also another term for this cycle.
Entrepeneur is a person who organizes, operates, and assumes the risk for a business venture so a cleaning supplies business is run by an entrepreneur. But a musician also operates a business and assumes risk. In my opinion both are entrepreneurs. But the person with the cleaning bisiness is for sure!
Answer:
Jobs argument
Explanation:
-The national-security argument states that some industries have to be protected by imposing tariffs to maintain the local production in case of a war.
-The unfair-competition argument says that the domestic market has to be protected when there is unfair competition because companies from other countries are subject to different regulations.
-Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument states that the threat of imposing a restriction can help to eliminate a restriction that was imposed by another country.
-Infant-industry argument says that new industries have to be protected because they don't have economies of scales that their competitors from others countries have.
-The jobs argument claims that the trade with other countries eliminates the local jobs.
According to this, the answer is that the senator is using the jobs argument to argue for the trade restriction on steel rods because he claims that it is necessary to impose those restrictions to protect the workers from losing their jobs.
