Answer:
B
Explanation:
The narrator talks about how the fire wasting a man that was tied to a stake. Assuming that the fire is symbolic for fate, it makes sense for this passage to describe parraylissis. Especially when looking in the context of the last sentence, describing the man as a "unalterable mold" "made of solid bronze" someone who is unaltered is unable to move, and solid bronze is unmovable by human hands after a certain amount is gathered. I was debating between A and D though, so I'll tell you why I didn't pick D. d refers to nature and mans lack of ability to change it, however where nature is involved in the passage (fire) the man doesn't try to shape or change it, it changes the man.
Explanation: how should I explain the two examples I gave plz help 20 points or moreThe setting and what is happening in no dog's bark provide imagery. "As his hands grabbed his father's throat, he clutched at the head, shaking as if it were a rattle." The details evoke a vivid image in the reader's mind, especially when the author uses an example of a rattle. in the sentence "there was the moon facing them a large red moon that filled their eyes with light and stretched and darkened its shadow over the earth" The details that the author uses to describe the moon and how they looked and how the earth looked was extremely specific and had enough detail to paint the image in our minds.
To walk or move slowly. Hope this helps ya out!
-Ella
Answer:
Explanation:
i think it 's gonna be 4 because sometimes it's good to tell your viewpoints
Answer:
inaccuracies of other scholars.
Explanation:
In the informative Essay by James Cross Giblin, of name: In The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone, the author shows many achievements of the scholars who were studying the hieroglyphs and trying to understand them.
He says that <em>"A few genuine advances in understanding the hieroglyphs were made during the 1700s."</em>, but he doesn't stop there, since the he doesn't refrain from criticizing other scholars as you can see here:
<em>"For example, a Greek writer named Horapollo said correctly that the picture of a goose stood for the word "son." But then he explained that this was because geese took special care of their young, which was completely inaccurate."</em>
