1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karolina [17]
4 years ago
13

How do polytheism and monotheism differ? A. Polytheists believe in many gods, while monotheists believe in one god. B. Polytheis

ts believe in earth gods while monotheists believe in gods in the heavens. C. Polytheists believe in one god while monotheists believe in multiple gods. D. Polytheists believe god is everywhere while monotheists believe god is only in church.
History
1 answer:
Anestetic [448]4 years ago
7 0
Polytheism - belief in many gods
monotheism - belief in one god

The answer is A. p<span>olytheists believe in many gods, while monotheists believe in one god.</span>
You might be interested in
Archaeologists' discovery of stone age family burials in europe was sociologically significant because
Ad libitum [116K]

The reason why the discovery of Stone Age family burial sites in Europe is significant is because cultural practices towards the dead can tell us a lot about the type of humans that existed at the time.  It can tell us whether these people were capable of abstract thinking, and also whether they understand the inevitability and irreversibility of death

Family burials in particular can also provide evidence of social hierarchies. The Neolithic burial chambers found in England show that the bones of the dead were used to mark social and family allegiances. Finally, some burials, like that of El Sidron in Spain, show signs of violence in the bones, and the family buried there showed severe signs of malnutrition. This had led scientists to believe that cannibalism, whether for nutritional or ritualistic purposes, was practiced.

3 0
4 years ago
Did the north or south have flat rivers?
DENIUS [597]

Answer:

Platte

The Platte over most of its length is a broad, shallow, meandering stream with a sandy bottom and many islands—a braided stream.

...

Platte River.

Platte River Nebraska River, Shallow River, Ñíbraxge (iow), Pȟaŋkéska Wakpá (lkt), Ní Btháska (oma), Kíckatus (paw)

4 0
3 years ago
Was the Roman Empire effective at promoting the common good?"
Furkat [3]

Explanation:

The Roman Empire which origins can be argued to either the ascent of Julius Caesar to Dictator, or the acceptance of Octavian Caesar as Augustus (First Citizen).  Basically, sometime in the 2nd have of the 1st century B.C.E.  At that time, the Roman state or Senatus and Populesque Romanus: Senate and People of Rome or SPQR) held an extreme number of treaties with it's neighbors.  Few of the people were considered part of the Republic and only Roman Citizens could vote or hold offices such as Senator, Quaestor, Tribune, or Consul.  Most civilizations governed themselves and had a Roman Governor.  These "Allies" would also supply soldiers for Auxiliaries to the Roman Legions.  At some point in the transition from Roman Republic to Roman Empire an incorporation began of citizenship.  This would allow previously non-citizens of the allied civilizations to be granted rights under Roman Law.  The concept had never been incorporated by any other civilization.  It had always previously been stipulated that family descent would delineate citizenship.  This was the first and foremost strength of the Roman Empire the ability to amalgamate it's people into a citizenship.  One of the best ways it was able to unify the other populations was the use of it's Language.  Because one had to understand Latin to understand it's Laws it became necessary for the people of the Empire to speak the same language and therefore Latin spread to every corner of the empire and displaced many languages in other territories, (this is why there are the Romance Languages, Spanish, Italian, French, and Romanian, all were parts of the Roman Empire for extreme periods of time).  The next aspect and probably the most distinguished is the Roman Army.  It was the greatest military force of professional soldiers in the Ancient World.  It's equipment was standardized as was the training.  The soldiers were however more than just well trained and well armed.  They were laborers and engineers.  Under Julius Caesar they were able to build a bridge across the Rhine in less than two weeks, without machines.  They would construct Roads, Aqueducts, Forts, Towns, Bridges, Temples, Walls, and whatever else they needed.  This Army/Labor force was mobile and terrifying, drawing on the experiences and fame of Julius Caesar and his memoirs about the Gallic Wars.  He and future Emperors would annihilate whole populations of rebellious civilizations (Gauls & Dacians come to mind, also don't forget about the expulsion of the Jews from Judea).  All of these factors allowed Roman Law to reign supreme and the peace or "Pax Romana" that occurred for several centuries allowed trade to flourish making Rome the center of the civilized world the envy of the Barbarians.    

When you take into account all of theses aspects 1.) Granting of Citizenship 2.) Language 3.) Military force 4.) Construction of military yet civilian necessities 5.) Flourishing trade coupled with extended periods of peace, it becomes easy to understand how one Civilization could be denoted as the Greatest of the Ancient world.  To contrast that, after the fall of Rome, Europe entered into a Dark Age that would last nearly 1200 years.  

Also unlike what the genius Phil said, there are many civilizations and Nations that lasted after 455 that attempted to use Rome as it's title and claim legitimacy to the Roman Empire, (Holy Roman Empire, Even the Germans use of Kaiser which is a translation of Caesar, the Russian use of Czar is a translation from Caesar and is suppose to represent the inheritance of the Byzantine Empire which was the remnants of the Eastern Roman Empire, lastly it can be argued the the Pope is the present ruler of the Roman Empire through the spirit of Catholicism).

3 0
3 years ago
What is demmocratic
Sliva [168]
Believing in or practicing social equality 
5 0
3 years ago
How did the battle at the alamo help the cause of Texas independence?
shepuryov [24]
The Battle of the Alamo made the Texans want revenge.
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Part C
    10·1 answer
  • Nile delta has excellent land for farming. why
    13·2 answers
  • The Act gave Parliament the right to make any laws they wished to regulate the colonies
    5·1 answer
  • Does George Washington's account contradict or support the account in the newspaper? Give two examples to support your response.
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these was a secret society whose members used violence and intimidation in response to the stamp act?
    11·2 answers
  • According to Chief Justice Warren, what fundamental questions does this case raise about the American justice system?
    9·1 answer
  • Which exploration did King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain sponsor?
    8·2 answers
  • Define: subcontinent, dharma, caste system , mandate of heaven, filial piety and nirvana.
    8·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE PLZ tell me why my questions keep getting reported <br> im just asking for help
    10·1 answer
  • HELP ME OUT PLEASE!!!!!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!