Answer:
a. a lawful action that is not a tort.
Explanation:
A tort refers to some wrongful act or some infringement of any right which is other than under any contract which leads to a legal liability. It is based on a civil law. People are liable for their actions taken against another both accidentally or intentionally.
In the context, the customers who is regular to Purity Cleaners tries to patronize or condescend OK Dry Cleaners instead of Purity Cleaners. This is lawful action, however not a tort.
Answer:
Business markets and consumer-goods markets differ in relation to the consumer and the form of operation. Business markets are formed by companies that provide products or services for other companies to manufacture their final products and services. Consumer goods markets, on the other hand, refer to companies that produce products and services already intended for final consumers.
The difference between them is that in business markets there are some significant advantages that reduce competitiveness, such as the creation of a long-term relationship with the customer, since the impact of buying and selling is greater, which also ensures greater stability business, since companies need constant inputs and services for their production of products and services to sell to the final consumer.
Answer:
The answer to this question is given below in the explanation section.
Explanation:
Constructive criticism is the process to offer valid and well-reasoned reponed or opinion about other works, it includes both positive and negative comments in a friendly way rather than an oppositional one.
There are four traits of constructive critisim.
So, the correct answer to this question is given below:
D: Positivity, Solution-Oriented, Specific, and private.
While other options are not correct because the four traits of constructive criticism are starting from positivity, solution-oriented, specific, and private.
Answer:
Neither project should be chosen
Explanation:
Given that
Each project cost of capital is 12%
The IRR of project A is 11.4%
And, the IRR of project B is 11.1%
As we can see that the cost of capital of each project with their internal rate of return so no project should be selected
Therefore the above statement represent an answer
The same should be relevant
The U.S. government should not have bailed out U.S. auto manufacturers.
Explanation:
- After the inflation period during the 1930, which continued almost for the next 30 years, America increased its standard of living - payment of higher taxes. With an income that was to be paid to government and to be used for their living, Americans had a tough time for almost 10 years to come out of the inflation they faced. Recession was also a part of this period during Hoover's presidency.
- Later, when Roosevelt was elected, his new ideals changed the phase of America which did not let the government stick to basic infrastructure of America. In this period, people of America unanimously agreed for the bailout of auto manufacturers with which, they earned revenue for other sector's development.
- In 2009, when the contract with General Motors was disintegrated, which was created during the time of World War II, the government of America did not want to take any risk/was not ready to face an economic hit. This eventually led for a bail out.
- With this step, in that period of time, it is an economically positive statement.
