Answer:
win based on strict liability
Explanation:
Strict liability is a liability that is imposed on party by the claimant that proves that an action occurred and the defendant is responsible for it.
This provision does not require the claimant to prove a fault by the defendant. It is mostly used when an action is considered dangerous.
In this scenario Mike was blasting some holes in rocks. This is a dangerous activity that can cause harm.
Myra who broke her legs in the explosion only needs to prove Mike was responsible for the explosion that occurred for her to win based on strict liability provision.
Growth requires developing a formal structure to function efficiently.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Growing a business from lower level to higher level requires lot of efforts and talents. If the business is developed and moving to the next level, it is necessary for the entrepreneur to follow certain formal structure.
The formal structure helps the owner of the company to maintain his standard in specific hierarchy. This formality may keep the employees or workers organized. The work will be allotted clearly to each and every one and each of them will have their own responsibilities.
Answer:
$600,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Controllable margin = $66,000
Sales = $480,000
Return on investment = 10%
Now,
Return on investment = Controllable Margin ÷ Average Operating Assets
or
10% = $60,000 ÷ Average Operating Assets
or
Average Operating Assets = 60000 ÷ 10%
or
Average Operating Assets = 60000 ÷ 0.01
or
Average Operating Assets = $600,000
Answer:
C. total variable cost increases
Explanation:
Fixed cost, as the name states, do not change with a variation on production output, therefore an increase in the sales volume does not change the fixed cost. Meanwhile, variable cost is the cost associated with the production of each unit, and thus depends on the sales volume. An increase in the volume of sales leads to an increase in total variable cost.
Therefore, the answer is C.
Answer:
$53,355.7047
Explanation:
The computation of the estimated cost of the replacement cost is shown below:
Estimated cost = (old cost i.e purchased cost of an equipment ÷ Cost index of that year i.e 2006) × estimated cost index for 2017
= ($30,000 ÷ 149) × 265
= $53,355.7047
We simply applied the above formula so that the estimated cost could come