It maintains the oral tradition of communities.
This what i found hope this helped. if not let me know
Answer:
a=0
Explanation:
5=5+2a
5-5=2a (Inverse operation of addition)
0=2a
0/2=2a/2
0=a
<span> He or she must prove that the slanderous statement was made with actual malice.
</span>
The supreme court case is called <span>New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. in the ruling it was held that actual malice must established in defining slanderous statement for compensation purposes.
</span>