1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
matrenka [14]
3 years ago
7

Country A has an absolute advantage over Country B in the production of both soybeans and corn. Explain a scenario in which both

countries would benefit if Country A specialized in soybeans and Country B specialized in corn.
Business
1 answer:
Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
3 0
This is a key idea with international trade.  This involves what is known as comparative advantage.
let's say country A can produce a ton of soybeans in 4 hours and a ton of corn in 2 hours.  While country B can produce a ton of soybeans in 15 hours and a ton of corn in 5 hours.  
Looking at this set up you can see that country A can produce both corn and soybeans faster, so they have an absolute advantage in both!
However what trade is based on is opportunity cost.  So if we think about how much corn country A has to give up to produce soybeans, they have to divert a total of 4 hours from corn to soy beans to produce one ton of soy beans.  That 4 hours could be used to produce 2 tons of corn (since 2 hours for 1 ton and we're taking away 4 hours!).  So opportunity cost of soybeans in country A is 2 corn.
In country B they would need a total of 15 hours to produce one extra ton of soybeans, but those 15 hours could instead be used to produce 3 tons of corn (5 hours per ton and we're stealing 15 total hours).  That means country B's opportunity cost is 3 corn.
Since A has a lower opportunity cost in produce soybeans they will specialize and B will specialize in corn.  
You might be interested in
Suppose the price of wheat is set at $5 a bushel and not allowed to decrease. This price is above the equilibrium price, which c
Talja [164]

Answer: it is price floor

Explanation:

5$ is the lowest the price can go because they will NOT set it any lower, but it can go higher from there.

i took the testtoo, i got it correct.

floor is the lowest price, ceiling is the highest.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In two to three sentences, explain how a tariff on cars can reduce the demand for imported cars.
artcher [175]
A tariff by definition is a tax to be paid on a particular class of imports or exports. so if people had to start paying extra for imported cars the demand for imported cars would be reduced and the demand for more domestic vehicles would rise.
3 0
3 years ago
9. You are trying to decide between two mobile phone carriers. Carrier A requires you to pay $200 for the phone and then monthly
ratelena [41]

Answer:

Carrier A

Explanation:

In order to decide the carrier on cost alone, we will use the Equivalent Annual Annuity method to calculate the best choice on cost alone. As shown below:

<u>Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) - Carrier A</u>

Total Present Value = -$200 + {-$54(PVIFA 0.2917%, 24 Periods)}

Total Present Value = -$200 + {-$54 x 26}

Total Present Value = -$200 + -1,404

Total Present Value = -$1,604

Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) = Total Present Value / (PVIFA 0.3333%, 24 Periods)

Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) = -$1,604 / 26

Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) = -$67

"Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) - Carrier A = -$67"

<u>Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) - Carrier B</u>

Total Present Value= -$95 + {-$72(PVIFA 0.3333%, 12 Periods)}

Total Present Value = -$95 + -$72 x 13

Total Present Value = -$95 - 936

Total Present Value = -$1,031

Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) = Total Present Value / (PVIFA 0.3333%, 12 Periods)

Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) = -$1,031 / 13

Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) = -$79

"Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) - Carrier B = -$79"

The "Carrier-A" should be selected, Since the Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) of Carrier-A (-$67) is higher than the Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) of Carrier-B (-$79).

<u>Note:</u> All figures in the calculation are rounded off to whole number

8 0
4 years ago
Last year mike bought 100 shares of dallas corporation common stock for $53 per share. during the year he received dividends of
Ronch [10]
Last year mike bought 100 shares of Dallas corporation common stock for = $53 per share
he received this year dividends of = $1.45 per share
stock is currently selling for = $60 per share
rate of return = ?
capital yield %= (60 - 53 / 53) x 100 = 0.132  x 100 = 13.2%
dividend yield % = (1.45 / 53) x 100 = 0.0273 x 100 = 2.73%
Total yield or rate of return will be = 13.2 + 2.73 = 15.94 %
7 0
3 years ago
The Miller Company earned $103,000 of revenue on account during Year 2. There was no beginning balance in the accounts receivabl
alekssr [168]

Answer:

The net realizable value of Miller's receivables at the end of Year 2 was $27,910

Explanation:

Let's start with the definition of each concept:

<u>Sales on account:</u> These represent sales which are not paid right away.

<u>Account receivable: </u>This is an account which represent the sales on account which currently are still unpaid.

When a sale is payed at the very moment it ocours, it is done using the cash account and the sales accounts.

<u>Allowance for doubful account: </u>  This account is a counter-assets account that decrease the net value of account receivable. It represent the account that will not be collected.

<u>The method to determinate the allowance will be the following:</u>

Sales on account x estimate uncollectiblle = Bad debt expense

$103,000 x 3% of sales =  3090 bad debt expense

<em>The journal entry to record this will be:</em>

bad debt expense debit  3090

allowance for doubful account  credit 3090

The company collected 72,000 of the sales on account during the year so the balance will be:

103,000 - 72,000 = 31,000 account receivable

So resuming the account receivable account have this movements:

account receivable debit for 103,000

sales revenue credit for 103,000

to show the sales on account

and then

cash debit for 72,000

account receivable credit for 72,000

to show the collections of the customer accounts

Now subtracting the espected bad debt we get the Miller's net realizable value at the end of Year 2:

31,000 - 3,090 = 27,910

Account receivable                     31,000

Allowance for doubful accounts (3,090)

net                                                 27,910

Have a nice evening !

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Low level employees pose the greatest threat to information security. <br> a. True <br> b. False
    7·1 answer
  • During September, the capital expenditure budget indicates a $280,000 purchase ofequipment. The ending September cash balance fr
    7·1 answer
  • There are several reasons why the petty cash fund would experience a shortage or an overage. Determine which of the actions belo
    9·1 answer
  • The basic difference between macroeconomics and microeconomics is:_________.
    10·1 answer
  • Fernando Designs is considering a project that has the following cash flows and WACC data. What is the project's discounted payb
    9·1 answer
  • [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Michicot Co. sold a scanner/copier costing $7,500 with a t
    11·1 answer
  • Rich is a cash-basis self-employed air-conditioning repairman with current year gross business receipts of $20,000. Rich's cash
    9·1 answer
  • ________ rights are the rights of shareholders who object to a proposed merger to have their shares valued by the court and rece
    6·1 answer
  • Are your loyal customers likely to switch to the new private label product? (That is, is the target market for the private label
    8·1 answer
  • Megan Company has fixed costs of $429,450. The unit selling price, variable cost per unit, and contribution margin per unit for
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!