The complete question is as follows:
Harding Corporation acquired real estate that contained land, building and equipment. The property cost Harding $1,330,000. Harding paid $315,000 and issued a note payable for the remainder of the cost. An appraisal of the property reported the following values: Land, $333,000; Building, $990,000 and Equipment, $657,000. (Round your intermediate percentages to the nearest whole number: i.e 0.054231 = 5%. Do not round any other intermediate calculations.)Assume that Harding uses the units-of-production method when depreciating its equipment. Harding estimates that the purchased equipment will produce 1,040,000 units over its 5-year useful life and has salvage value of $17,000. Harding produced 269,000 units with the equipment by the end of the first year of purchase.Which amount below is
closest to the amount Harding will record for depreciation expense for the equipment in the first year?
A. $169,936
B. $165,538.462
C. $109,126
D. $88,460
Answer: B. $165,538.462
Explanation
Formula: Depreciation expense = step a
(cost of asset - salvage value)/estimated total units produced
step b = (step a) x actual units produced
step a = (65-17000)/1040000
= step a x 269000 = $B. $165,538.462
Answer:
B. Unethically exploiting their power and size in the marketplace.
Explanation:
Infringing upon a patent in this way breaks the ethical barrier. Gaggle Inc. not on builds the knock-off product but does so because they realize that Chirp Chirp does not have the financial capability to fight them. If both companies were of a similar stature Gaggle Inc. would not have done this as they would be penalized after legal proceedings.
Answer:
The sino-japanese war was fought between Japan and China
Explanation:
........................
Answer:
the question is incomplete:
It happens that the set of consumption bundles (xA,xB) such that Charlie is indifferent between (xA,xB) and (20,5) is the set of all bundles such that xB = 100/xA. The set of bundles (xA,xB) such that Charlie is just indifferent between (xA,xB) and the bundle (10,15) is the set of bundles such that xB = 150/xA.
I also found the attached graph.
The requirements are:
- Is (30,5) ≈ (10,15) true or false?
- Is (10,15) > (20,5) true or false?
- Is (20,5) ≥ (10,10) true or false?
- Is (24,4) ≥ (11,9.1) true or false?
- Is (11,14) > (2,49) true or false?
- A set is convex if for any two points in the set, the line segment between them is also in the set. Is the set of bundles that Charlie weakly prefers to (20,5) a convex set?
- Is the set of bundles that Charlie considers inferior to (20,5) a convex set?
- The slope of Charlie’s indifference curve through a point, (xA,xB), is known as his ______________ ___ of ___________ at that point.
- Find Charlie’s marginal rate of substitution at the point (10,10).
- Find Charlie’s marginal rate of substitution at the point (5,20).
- Find Charlie’s marginal rate of substitution at the point (20,5).
- Do the indifference curves you have drawn for Charlie exhibit diminishing marginal rates of substitution?
Answers:
- true, they are on the same red line
- true, (10,15) is on the red line while (20,5) is on the blue line
- true, they are equivalent since both are on the blue line
- false, (11,9.1) is on the blue line and (24,4) is on the red line
- true, (11,14) is on the red line while (2,29) is on the blue portion
- yes, it is a convex set
- no, they are not a convex set
- The slope of Charlie’s indifference curve through a point, (xA,xB), is known as his <u>RATE</u> of <u>SUBSTITUTIO</u>N at that point.
- marginal rate of substitution at (10,10) = -10/10 = -1
- marginal rate of substitution at (5,20) = -20/5 = -4
- marginal rate of substitution at (20,5) = -5/20 = -1/4 = -0.25
- yes, this curves shows diminishing marginal rates of substitutions, e.g. goes from -4 to -1 to -0.25
<span>Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)</span>