In my opinion, George Washington's Farewell Address was a fair and clear warning against political parties/alliances. The reason being is because, having all these alliances and political parties would cause a war. If everyone stated their opinions, and someone doesn't like it, then they will fight about it until the conflict is resolved. Republicans formed a number of societies and clubs throughout the nation, which spread criticism of Washington's political decisions. This caused the birth of the Republican Party after Thomas Jefferson resigned from Washington's cabinet. Washington was against the Federalists which caused a little conflict with the Republican Party. Further more, more evidence provides that Washington's address was a fair warning, due to the fact that more conflict grew in his later term of presidency. Battles raged in the press, attacking one's political views. All in all, i would say that Washington's Farewell Address was a fair, and clear warning. It was correct in my opinion. hope this helped, have an amazing day :)<span />
Answer:
<em>True</em>
Explanation:
Researchers claim that human migration to Southeast Asia began in 4000 BC and Tonga and Samoa was settled by 1300 BC. Captain Samuel Wallis was the first documented explorer to discover the island of Tahiti.
Captain James cook also made his first trip to Tahiti in April 1769 and made the first map of the island illustrations of flora and fauna. The British and French missionaries arrived at the islands in 1800s and it started rivalry between France an Britain to gain control of the islands.
Tahiti was ruled by native Pomare Family until December 29, 1880. In 1880 The french reached an agreement with the Queen's son, Pomare Fifth and purchased lands.
They transformed the protectorate into officially recognised colony. It was reconstituted as French overseas territory and was named French Polynesia. It gained autonomy in 1977 and became an overseas country of the French Republic on February 12, 2004.
No, the Colombian exchange brought new food to the Americas such as cattle, pigs, and wheat (in exchange for foods such as tomatoes, squash, and beans).
Answer:
Question 1: Actually, he did not. If he did export and spread the ideals of the Revolution, why did he appoint his brothers and other people to high points in government? Apart from that, they held the position of kings and monarchs which is opposite to the ideals of the Revolution. It should be that the people have the right to decide for themselves but they didn’t. Instead, they lived in fear and rebelled against him.
Question 2: Both revolutions started rather moderately, with people demanding more representation in government. Neither gained the full support of everyone in the respective nations either, as evidenced by Loyalists in the US and counterrevolutions in areas like the Vendee in France. In France, the revolution became more radical and ideological, taking Enlightenment ideals and rationalism to the extreme. The revolution in France also led to the dictatorship of Napoleon and the restoration is Bourbon monarchs, so ultimately a return to the status quo, while the American Revolution was successful in gaining American independence. Furthermore, the French Revolution was fought in France while the American Revolution was fought in the colonies of England and never sought to completely depose George III, just remove his control of the colonies.
<span>Yucatan Peninsula. Its location is in Maya.
</span>
