Answer:
once upon a time, there were three gods, these gods are Odin,vel,villi they are brother's. one day the three gods declared that Ymir ( the frost giant)
was a cannibal and evil giant. so the three gods agree that they will ymir. after they killed ymir the corspe of ymir, they make it into land,water, mountains,forest,trees,animals,humans and the remaining, was made into worlds also known as the 9realms
Answer:
1=
Claim can be defined as those states or asserts provided against some topic, or for the positive impacts of something. The claim can be evidence or proof for what has been mentioned.
The claim that is directly against the argument of the cousin that the colonies should not stay under British rule, this is because the British rule taxed too much taxes on each and everything. One more reason is that they even put too much tax rates on consumption or buying tea.
This shows that the colonies must not stay under British rule.
2=
Negative positive positive
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Dr. Dowell says that we need to be prepared for a pandemic. He thinks every nation should have an emergency plan. More medications like Tamiflu should be available. He thinks rich countries like the U.S. should help poor countries pay for medicine and health care.
Why does the author most likely include this information at the end of the text instead of at the beginning?
A. because it draws a conclusion based on the evidence presented throughout the text
B. because it offers new evidence that is meant to help readers better understand the text
C. because it poses new questions for readers to think about now that they have read the text
D. because it offers supplemental information that readers can compare to evidence presented in the text
Answer:
The author includes this information at the end of the text:
A. because it draws a conclusion based on the evidence presented throughout the text
.
Explanation:
After discussing and presenting evidence throughout the text, author John DiConsiglio is now ready to conclude it. What he presents at the end cannot be new evidence or supplemental information, for that would not be a conclusion at all. He is also not presenting questions - he is making statements. Those statements are based on the information presented previously, supported by it. What the author wants now is to show how important that information was and how we can use it to be prepared for future cases of the disease.
