C. They both believed that individuals have the right and the responsibility to protest unjust laws.
Thoreau and M. Luther King believed that one should speak out against an injustice. They believed that the government had flaws . They believed that one should stand up for what he or she believes in, as well as accepting the consequences for his actions.
Answer:
I think maybe the amounts of food and dictation.
Hope this helped!!!
Answer: All of the above are advantages of ADR
Explanation: Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a way in which two or more disputing parties comes together to settle their differences without litigation. In other words ADR is a means of settlement between two or more people, with out the use of law court.
ADR is faster because litigation takes more time, before the lawyers can present their cases for the judge to decide.
ADR keeps the two parties talking on how to adjust the dispute and be at peace, instead of fighting in the law court for a case.
ADR is less expensive, because you don't need to pay anyone to defend your case.
Answer:
This risk is known as the overjustification effect.
Explanation:
This effect is a phenomenon in which an individual loses his/her intrinsic motivation (motivation from internal factors) because of being rewarded by something. This means the individual is less likely to do something if he/she is rewarded by outside factors.
In this case, since the individual is required to carry out community service because of external factors such as a requirement by a school or business, his/her motivation to do it in the future because he/she wants to will diminish, thus the <em>overjustification effect is the risk. </em>
Love for her his ability to care about something besides himself
