1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kumpel [21]
3 years ago
10

Which two of the following are ways in which England's monarchy changed after the Glorious Revolution?

History
2 answers:
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a and c

Explanation:

Parliament passed the English Bill of Rights, which limited the monarch's powers and established that Parliament controlled the monarch’s power. The Bill of Rights rejected divine right, the idea that monarchs received their authority from God and didn’t have to answer to the people. The English Bill of Rights also established Parliament as the supreme lawmaking body.

anygoal [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct answers are:

<em>a)The idea of divine right ended in England.</em>

<em>c) Parliament became the supreme legal body.</em>

<em />

Explanation:

The Glorious Revolution is an important time in the history of England. For the first time, the kind of England was replaced ending the notion of 'divine right' to rule.

At the same time, the Parliament became the most powerful institution in the country which was responsible for making and enacting laws, superseding the Monarch for the first time.

However, the other options are incorrect. The Monarchs in England have never faced a limit on their reign and the House of Lords still exists till this day.

You might be interested in
How did the fall of Rome reshape the wester world in the mideval period
Vanyuwa [196]

The Fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called Fall of the Roman Empire or Fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which it failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control; modern historians mention factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperor, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from "barbarians" outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2]

Relevant dates include 117 CE, when the Empire was at its greatest territorial extent, and the accession of Diocletian in 284. Irreversible major territorial loss, however, began in 376 with a large-scale irruption of Goths and others. By 476 when Odoacer deposed the Emperor Romulus, the Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Invading "barbarians" had established their own power in most of the area of the Western Empire. While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again.

The Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

5 0
2 years ago
During the pandemic what lessons did trump and biden apply from past history?
nignag [31]

Answer:

for schools to be shut down?

Explanation:

...

4 0
2 years ago
Which of these is a gift of money from one government to another?
yanalaym [24]
I think A but I don’t know if I’m right
3 0
2 years ago
To end their conflict, what must the Mandarins realize is more important than this competition?
jarptica [38.1K]
What’s the context for this question
8 0
3 years ago
I REALLY NEED THIS ASAP PLEASE HELP ME
3241004551 [841]

Those who fought in mexican american war known as soldier. Those who live in France known as French. Petit, Délicieux, Beau these words describe french.

Colonial, Immigrant, Hipster, Native American, African American  these words describe the United States.

U.S senators chose this kind of language to characterize each country because to identify them linguistically.

Explanation:

Immigrants means those who are entering into the country due to some pull  factors ( better quality of life, technological advancement, better health facilities etc.) and increasing the population density into that country. Colonial countries are those which are related to countries. Native American are those who are living in America since its inception.

Delicieux means delicious. Beau means handsome or beautiful. Petit means small. All these are english meaning of french words. U.S senators chose a kind of language to characterize each country because its proved as a good identity of each country.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What made the knights of labor so successful in bringing workers together
    14·1 answer
  • What inspired the Founding Fathers to write the Declaration of Independence?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following were main points in the Treaty of Versailles?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the South gain more political power as its population grew
    10·1 answer
  • 25 POINTS! What are your thoughts about the ongoing impact Japanese Internment during WWII?
    10·1 answer
  • What did the so-called thomas proviso state?
    11·1 answer
  • A ___________ is a group of companies joined to eliminate competition, fix prices at high levels and drive smaller competitors o
    6·1 answer
  • 1. What is believed to be the first kingdom of South Africa?
    14·1 answer
  • 4. Describe the location of China relative to two land-based geographic features.
    6·1 answer
  • Woodstock in 1969 was the pinnacle of
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!