1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gogolik [260]
3 years ago
13

How are human beings different from angels?

History
2 answers:
iren2701 [21]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Though there are some things that angels and humans have in common, there are many things that separate them. Humans have been made in the image of God. They are able to bear children and have family relationships. Though sin entered into both the angelic and human sphere, only the sin of humans can be forgiven. Christ came to die for the sins of humanity, not of angels. Those humans who have trusted Christ as their Savior will eventually judge angels. Because of these things, the humans who have believed in Jesus will have a superior position to the angels in the ages to come.</span>
Tpy6a [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

God created humans to be different than the angels, spirit creatures He had already created even before He made the world. God gave humans eternal spirits, just as the angels were given, but He also gave them something different—physical bodies. The physical body meant that humans had limitations to their strength that angels did not experience. The body also meant that the humans could experience physical pleasures planned for them by God and could have children and know the joys of family love.

You might be interested in
Why was diversity bad for the Austrian rulers?
Nutka1998 [239]
Because his dad is not okay
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What two political parties emerged before the election of 1796?
astra-53 [7]
Federalists and Democratic-Republicans
3 0
3 years ago
Why do governments acquire debt?
kati45 [8]

Answer:

From a public policy standpoint, the issuance of debt is typically accepted by the public, so long as the proceeds are used to stimulate the growth of the economy in a manner that will lead to the country's long-term prosperity

5 0
3 years ago
What decision did the Supreme Court reach in Dred Scott v. Sandford?
loris [4]

Answer:

There have been many decisions in the history of the US Supreme Court that are hard to call democratic. In the British North American colonies, and then in the USA, the legal foundations of the institution of slavery were created. The English legal system ruled out slavery, but gradually in the local laws of the colonies, and later in the Constitution of the United States and in the case-law of the Supreme Court of the United States, the grounds were formulated on which slaves were considered not to be human subjects, but property. This practice has led to the fact that, shortly before the Civil War, a racist attitude was legalized not only towards slaves, but also to the entire black population of the United States, as is clearly seen in the case of Dread Scott v. Sandford.

Dread Scott was a slave whose owner John Emerson took him from Missouri, the state where slavery was allowed, to Illinois, where slavery was prohibited. A few years later, Scott returned to Missouri with Emerson. Scott believed that since he lived in a free state, he should no longer be considered a slave.

Emerson died in 1843, and three years later, Scott sued Emerson's widow, demanding his freedom. In 1850, he won the case in one of the Missouri courts, but in 1852, the state supreme court overturned the lower court. Meanwhile, Ms. Emerson remarried, and Scott became the legal property of her brother John Sanford. Scott sued Sanford to regain his freedom. The case was investigated in one of the federal courts, which in 1854 ruled against Sanford.

When this case was referred to the Supreme Court, its members decided that Scott did not become free by virtue of his living in a free state and that, being a black man, he is not a citizen and, therefore, has no right to file a lawsuit with a court in force according to the norms of general and statutory law. This decision was widely criticized and contributed to the election of Abraham Lincoln as president.

The judgment in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was declared unconstitutional by the thirteenth constitutional amendment, which abolished slavery in 1865, and the fourteenth amendment, which granted citizenship to former slaves in 1868.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls HELP its for a TEST
Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

The answer is D.

Explanation:

As shown on the graph, most people voted for "Inform Constituents", which would mean they would rather inform/educate voters and office holders. Which would lead to the answer being D.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The ____________ Doctrine was an unofficial declaration of war on terror. It indicated that there would be no distinction betwee
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT true of Peter the Great's Grand Embassy? *
    15·1 answer
  • Which country was an ally of South Korea during the Korean War?
    7·2 answers
  • What type of government is best described as power in the hands of few
    10·1 answer
  • Why doesn’t the declaration of independence address the women’s issues discussed and Abigail Adams letter?
    5·1 answer
  • How are a paraphrase and a question similar
    11·1 answer
  • Are civil liberties important to maintaining a democratic society?<br><br>I NEED HELP PLZ​
    13·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Selective Service Act?
    14·1 answer
  • In what ways did the federal government change during WWI?
    9·2 answers
  • Write a short letter that explains what the Old Testament tells us about the image of God.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!