Explanation:
C. Cornwallis’ army was greatly weakened.
Serfs were mostly peasant farmers who provided labor in their masters land. Peasants would pay the lord by working for them in exchange to use their lords land to generate their own food. Serfs did not have money. they were basically slaves. They would work at least three times a week. The serf was bound to work in a single manor. The status of serf was passed down to their children.
<span>Herbert Sulzbach was a
German writer and also diplomat who was born in 1894, he believed in the good
of humanity and helped prisoners in their personal needs also. He was of a
Jewish descent. His vision of armistice was not what actually happened as
armistice means an agreement to stop fighting. This is not what actually
happened, Germans did not surrender. </span>
It was too flimsy. It failed to take into account real issues between the state and national governments. It took a long time to approve because the central, national government was designed weak, essentially impossible to emend, states had their own money and foreign policy, and the national government proved unable to quell rebellions (proved by Shay’s Rebellion.) All this proves that the main issue is the fact the central government was weakened and state governments had too much control over the fate of the union.
I’m not sure what the question is asking, but persuasion through voice inflection is key
