The correct answer is C) gun-rights group.
The National Rifle Association is an example of a gun-rights group.
NRA stands for the National Rifle Association. This is a controversial organization in the United States that supports the possession of guns. The NRA represents the interests of a group of people in America who own guns.
These NRA members hire lobbyists to negotiate with legislators in order to favor their particular interests. One of the petitions of this group is to vote against the laws that could control guns.
Some US citizens and groups are in favor of gun control laws due to the many terrible shooting incidents in high school, shopping center, and other places across the country.
we know that
According to Sigmund Freud, the principle of reality is what prevents doing something that is not correct.
To understand the principle of reality, it is important to have an idea of how the two personality components identified by Freud work. The ID seeks to satisfy the initial desire. It is governed by the pleasure principle: the idea that impulses must be fulfilled immediately.
The ego, on the other hand, is the component of the personality that ensures that the desires of identification are satisfied in an effective and appropriate manner; In other words, the ego is governed by the principle of reality.
The ego does not try to block an impulse, but, on the contrary, it works to make sure that the wishes of the id are fulfilled in a safe, realistic and appropriate way.
therefore
the answer is
According to Freud, asking to earn the money comes from the ego, which provides a compromise solution that reflects the reality principle
Answer:
The Monarchy
Explanation:
The British Monarch is the UK's Head of State. Though it is largely a ceremonial position, the monarch and royal family maintain a strong public presence.
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
