The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer:
It will simply not provide any benefit for anyone, including himself.
Answer:
The correct answer is It allows workers to specialize in a variety of skills
Explanation:
Job specialization (also known as division of labor) first proposed by the scottish economist Adam Smith, exposed in his main work "The Wealth of Nations" in 1776, refers to the process of breaking large jobs into smaller jobs assigned to individual workers. The purpose of job specialization is to focus each worker's concentration on a specific area of expertise within the production process. The argument states that, through the specialization and refinement of skills, productivity will increase.
Answer:
Sign language is nonverbal communication for those who can't or don't want to use verbal communication.
Explanation:
