Although you did not specify the civilizations you should compare Hammurabi's code with, here I leave relevant points about the code that may help you:
- Hammurabi's code is a collection of laws carved in a stone pillar during the Babylonian emperor Hammurabi's realm. After conquering the land within the Mesopotamian valley, he needed to unify the territory of his empire under the same laws. It is the first written code of laws.
- As laws were written, judges could not change them at the moment. This was a guarantee of justice for citizens. Other civilizations like the Romans and Hebrews also had written codes of laws.
- The code includes mainly a list of crimes and punishments established for them. The punishments defer according to the social rank of the victim and the criminal.
- Punishments could be payments in species or metals, but also corporal, following the "eye for an eye" criteria of justice, or Tallion's law. This concept of justice can also be found in old Hebrew tradition, and in the Quran.
You can learn more about Hammurabi's code in the link below:
brainly.com/question/13117286
#SPJ4
The sources of vice, religous threats, and other assualts on traditional values
Negative points:
-the machines replaced the human workforce;
-the worker loses control over the final product;
-The price of progress comes from factories.
There is no work for everyone.
- elite enrichment, owner of the means of production to the detriment of the
miserable wages they pay to the minority.
Answer:
Babylon and Hittites were two different empires based on different geological locations, social structure, and cultural beliefs.
Explanation:
the first thing to the contrast between the two ancient empires was their different geological locations for example while the Babylonians were concentrated in the Mesopotamian region, the Hittites were in the Anatolian area. Religious convictions have had a major impact on the cultural side of life. While the Hittite people gave more importance to the local pantheon, temples during the Babylon empire were major influencers of cultural life.
<span>The main argument presented was that parents were able to monitor and keep track of the milk being consumed by their baby. When a child is breast-feeding it is not as simple to measure the amount that your child is consuming, and thus, proponents of the bottle argued for the bottle in that regard.</span>
