1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol13
3 years ago
14

The first leader of the Persian empire was__ he led against the __ and expanded the empire throughout Central Asia. He was known

for being fair & just. The __ provides direct evidence of his reign
History
2 answers:
Fynjy0 [20]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The first leader of the Persian empire was Cyrus II the Great. He led against the medes and expanded the empire throughout Central Asia. He was known for being fair & just. The Holy Bible provides direct evidence of his reign.

Explanation:

Hello!

In 600 BC, Cyrus was born in the city of Anshan.

In 550 BC, he defeated the Army of Media, which was commanded by King Astiages. Then, Cyrus conquered the kingdoms of Lydia and Babylon.  In this way, Cyrus founded the Persian empire, which was the largest until then.

The Hebrew Bible mentions Cyrus as the king who freed the Jewish people from slavery in Babylon.

There are also texts of Babylonian origin that describe his reign. They are the chronicles of Nabonido and the Cyrus cylinder.

Success in your homework!

antoniya [11.8K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1- cyrus the great

2-medes

3-cyrus cylinder

Explanation:

-i took the test its right

You might be interested in
Those who opposed Hamilton's financial policies were northern merchants who believed in government by the wealthy and powerful.
Lisa [10]
I wanna say false but i am not sure
6 0
3 years ago
Explain how a factory owner would view capitalism
xenn [34]

Answer:

Economic theorizing

utilizes, on the one hand, mathematical techniques and, on the other, thought

experiments, parables, or stories. Progress may stagnate for various reasons.

Sometimes we are held back for lack of the technique needed to turn our stories

into the raw material for effective scientific work. At other times, we are

short of good stories to inject meaning into (and perhaps even to draw a moral

from) our models. One can strive for intellectual coherence in economics either

by attempting to fit all aspects of the subject into one overarching

mathematical structure or by trying to weave its best stories into one grand

epic.

This paper attempts to revive an old

parable, Adam Smith’s theory of manufacturing production, which has been

shunted aside and neglected because it has not fitted into the formal structure

of either neoclassical or neo-Ricardian theory. The paper attempts to persuade

not by formal demonstrations (at this stage) but by suggesting that the parable

can illuminate many and diverse problems and thus become the red thread in a

theoretical tapestry of almost epic proportions.

The subject may be approached from either

a theoretical or a historical angle. Regarding the theoretical starting-point,

it is possible to be brief since the familiar litany of complaints about the

neoclassical constant-returns production function hardly bears repeating. The

one point about it that is germane here is that it does not describe production

as a process, i.e., as an ordered sequence of operations. It is more like a

recipe for bouillabaisse where all the ingredients are dumped in a pot, (K, L),

heated up, f(·), and the output, X, is ready. This abstraction

from the sequencing of tasks, it will be suggested, is largely responsible for

the well-known fact that neoclassical production theory gives us no [204] clue

to how production is actually organized. Specifically, it does not help us

explain (1) why, since the industrial revolution, manufacturing is normally

conducted in factories with a sizeable workforce concentrated to one workplace,

or (2) why factories relatively seldom house more than one firm, or (3) why

manufacturing firms are “capitalistic” in the sense that capital

hires labor rather than vice versa.

5 0
2 years ago
In the british caribbean colonies, slaves from __________ wore garments made of cloth woven in __________ from cotton grown in _
tia_tia [17]
<span>Africa, England, Britain are the answers, Hope this helps love :)</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Why did the Industrial Revolution in the United States get started in New England?
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

I dont know sorry

Explanation:

sorryyyyyy

4 0
3 years ago
The best alternate headline for this article would be __________.
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

we need to see the artical

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what ways did women help in the war effort at home? Select all that apply.
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the Lingqu Canal built?
    10·2 answers
  • how did Spanish settlement patterns in the new world differ from those of the of the English Dutch and French
    14·1 answer
  • Which pact signed by Germany was part of a European policy of appeasement?
    15·2 answers
  • A factor that we can the US economy following is initial surge was The unequal distribution of
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes the degree of influence that the chairman of a committee has in determining what
    9·1 answer
  • What impact did the new deal have on arts and letters in the 1930s
    8·1 answer
  • Why did God not save Jesus during the Crucifixion?
    13·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete each sentence Land, labor, and capital also are known as factors of Economies must answer th
    10·1 answer
  • Which sentence from the article best illustrates the claim that "[t]here was complicity between the city government and the mob"
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!