Answer:
higher than net income computed under variable costing when units produced are greater than units sold
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing techniques are used to compute the accounting cost of various operation. The calculation procedures of both the techniques are different; that is why the results are different. The net income under absorption costing is higher because it takes into account the indirect expenses and indirect costs. Likewise, absorption costing technique also includes manufacturing or overhead cost.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The answer is Job perfomance= Motivation x Ability x Situational x Constraints
Explanation:
Because in this formula, job performance is how well someone performs the requirements of the job, motivation is the degree to which someone works hard to do the job well, ability is the degree to which workers possess the knowledge, skills, and talent to do the job well, and situational constraints are factors beyond the individual control of the empolyees. Such as policies, resources. Since job perfomance is a multiple function of motivation times ability times situational constraints, the job performance wil decline if one of those elements is considered insuficient. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The correct answer is r=(DIV1/P0)+g
Explanation:
The expected rate of return for a stock is usually the dividend yield  added to capital gains yield.
Dividend yield is the percentage of the share's price that the company pays to shareholders as dividends and the formula is the dividends divided by the share price, hence in this scenario it DIV1/PO
On other hand,capital gains yield is the percentage increase of the share price over time. In other words, the share price growth rate,which is a market expectation of the company's performance.The g given in the question depicted this.
Without mincing words,the expected rate of return on the stock is dividends yield(DIV1/P0) plus the capital gains yield(g)
 
        
             
        
        
        
First, you have to calculate the amount of tuition when the student reaches age 18. Do this by multiplying $11,000 by 1.07 each year from age 12 until it reaches age 18. Thus, 7 times.
At age 18: 16,508
At age 19: 17,664
At age 20: 18,900
At age 21: 20,223
Then, we use this formula:
A = F { i/{[(1+i)^n] - 1}}
where A is the monthly deposit each year, F is the half amount of the tuition each year illustrated in the first part of this solution, n is the number of years lapsed.
At age 18:
A = (16508/2) { 0.04/{[(1+0.04)^6] - 1}} = $1,244.389 deposit for the 1st year
Ate age 19
A = (17664/2) { 0.04/{[(1+0.04)^7] = $1,118 deposit for the 2nd year
At age 20:
A = (18900/2) { 0.04/{[(1+0.04)^8] = $1,025 deposit for the 3rd year
At age 21:
A = (18900/2) { 0.04/{[(1+0.04)^8] = $955 deposit for the 4th year