Answer: just get your parents to double check it and fix your spelling errors etc and turn in your final draft
Explanation:
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
Answer:
Q=120−4P
Explanation:
putting P = 20 we get
q= 40
we know that elasticity is quantity demanded / price
20
40
=2
hence the correct option: D
Answer:
8.25%
Explanation:
Orange, Inc. should calculate the MARR (minimum acceptable rate of return) for this project using the following:
Re = 12% (similar to Paste, Inc., so it can be considered the industry's average)
Rd = 6% x (1 - 25%) = 4.5%
MARR = (1/2 x 12%) + (1/2 x 4.5%) = 6% + 2.25% = 8.25%
This calculation is similar to calculating a company's WACC since you must determine the weighted cost of financing the project.
A unique individual is the answer (if this is right can you please mark as brainliest, thanks)
