The logical inference a person can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist is:
- <u>He would have shown him how there was no freedom in China twenty years ago</u>
<u />
According to the given question, the narrator says that the American artist is making unnecessary protests about having so little freedom.
This shows an irony that he does not appreciate the freedom he enjoys and feels he lacks freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that the logical inference we can make about the good lesson which he wants to teach the American artist is that he would show him how little freedom there was in China twenty years ago and how he enjoys freedom.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/8369124
For example Mrs. Bennett claims Mr.bennet has no regard for her Nerves when in reality he claims that he is well aware of her Nerves meaning that he agrees she is crazy
Answer:
Republicans opposed the extension of slavery
Explanation:
During the political campaign for the Senate in the State of Illinois in 1858, Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglass had a series of debates on important political issues that affected the country in those years. The most important topic; the issue of slavery. Historians consider these debates as one of the most interesting due to the kind of arguments both candidates expressed. The Republican Party that Abraham Lincoln represented, was in favor of abolitionism. In those years, the country was very divided between the southerners that supported slavery because the economy of the south depended on slaves to work in the large plantations to produce crops and the northerners that were against slavery and favored abolitionism. Lincoln opposed slavery into other northern states, and that is what he expressed during the debates.
Have a good Day!
Answer:
persuasiveness
Explanation:
because persuasiveness is the ability of being able to make you want to do or belive a particular thing.
i hope this helps
Actions can hold people accountable on how they produce their feelings. If someone were to “madly” yell at someone that they are in a argument with. They can end up saying harsh things or doing harsh things. That can hold them accountable. Again how I said “actions, how they produce their feelings”. Is showing that depending on how the person feels it can be associated with their actions!
