The result of the young seaman's disrespectful attitude was that <em>A. </em><em>God punished the seaman </em><em>for his cruelty by inflicting him </em><em>with a sickness </em><em>so serious that </em><em>he did not recover.</em>
William Bradford was one of the travelers on the Mayflower that was sailing to the future Plymouth colony. In his journals, he wrote of a young man who sailed with them.
The young man was quite problematic because:
- he disrespected the sick
- he cursed the sick and told them that he would help throw them overboard and take their property and,
- he was quite vulgar
He was however struck with a sickness that according to William Bradford, came from God. The young man never made it to the colony and was instead thrown overboard.
In conclusion, because of the young man's disrespect, God punished him with an illness that killed him.
<em>More on the journey can be found at brainly.com/question/19737965.</em>
Answer:
1. Cathartic (arousal of emotions)
2. Self-purification
3. Logic and harmony in thoughts.
Explanation: Gandhi was a leader, mentor, and an authority in himself. His ideals are still being used for reference. The way he used to drive the audience mad through his impressive speech pattern and techniques to follow his principles is miraculous. His impressive speech pattern and techniques used to connect to the audience via arousing their emotions (Cathartic in Aristotelian term) as the subjects of his speech are more often dominated by the personal experiences and talks about morality, truth, non-violence, harmony, etc. These subjects developed a sense of credibility and authenticity among the audience towards him. Lastly, <em>his ideals were quite logical and reasonable which made his speech very persuasive in nature</em> and thus, he was successful in delivering his message to his audience's mind and heart throughout.
The statement "doing less is an ideal that we should embrace" may have been adopted by some people who have been successful in their choices. However, these people are rare cases, it is not easy and recurring to be successful and reach your goals in establishing a path of dedication and effort. Doing less does not guarantee that we will succeed, we must always seek, learn and fight for what we want.
We can use as an example the success story of Bill Gates, where this statement does not fit. We can find several testimonials about how Gates and his team worked (sometimes exhaustively) to establish the success of his company.
//
The counter argument is convincing in that it brings a concrete example of someone who worked to get what he has, as well as presenting arguments that can be identifiable with the present day.
School and having the perfect grades and being envolved in multiple clubs just to get into a college