1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astra-53 [7]
3 years ago
14

What consequences might a country face when it deals with a state of anarchy? How can a state of anarchy result in violence and

safety risks?
History
1 answer:
Irina-Kira [14]3 years ago
6 0
Anarchy means there are absolutely no laws and you can go around and do whatever you want. This means that murder and robbery is bound to happen and there would be no safety.

Hope this helps.
You might be interested in
Immigrants who are looking for a place of safety are called .
zhuklara [117]

Answer:

Immigrants who are looking for a place of safety are called

<em><u>An asylum-seeker</u></em>

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Soviet Union’s system of government help to create conflict with the United States after World War II?
wel
Correct answer choice is:

<span>A. The Soviet system of government did not allow its people to choose their own leaders, which the United States thought was wrong.

</span> The United States and the Soviet Union became rivals after World War II because of the factor of trust between two nations. They didn't trust each other and tried to let down each other and the cold war started. It was the time of <span>competition and confrontation between them. The conflict was so serious that there was a threat of nuclear war, which could have led to extreme consequences.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
What does Wilson say about what Americans should do and say about the war? (check all that apply)
Ilya [14]
Its 1 Americans should speak in favor of neutrality.
      4 It is important for every American to have the same spirit.


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The theory of Laissez-Faire economics was used during the late 1800s to..
mixas84 [53]
1 is correct. Laissez-Faire is the theory of no government intervention in trade. In the late 1800s there were a lot of wealthy big businesses, mainly corporations, that were causing the ruin of smaller ones. People who opposed big business called for government regulation of it. The supporters of big business attempted to justify it using Laissez-Faire.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effects did the Mayans non centralized government have on their history
ElenaW [278]
How did the Maya operate politically without a centralized government? The Maya had city-states that were not unified. They were tied to each other through a system of economic exchange through trading rather than direct rule through a centralized government.
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the uk control when it declared war on germany world war 2?
    15·1 answer
  • 99 POINTS TO BRAINIEST ANSWER!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Which region was protected from outside influence by the monroe doctrine?
    15·1 answer
  • Which basic requirements are necessary to establish a government?
    14·1 answer
  • Sir Robert of Avesbury
    12·1 answer
  • Which group was most interested in using the government to make human
    13·1 answer
  • How does the declaration of the rights of man define liberty?
    6·1 answer
  • What was cuneiform and who invented?
    11·2 answers
  • Would the Vietnam War be more accurately described as a cold war engagement or a struggle against colonialism? What facts would
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following were Progressive educational reforms? (Choose 3 that apply) *
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!