Answer:
Humanity’s environmental footprint has increased, but at a much slower rate compared to population and economic growth because of more efficient use of natural resources, reports Mongabay
Explanation:
There is a long-standing dispute on the extent to which population growth causes environmental degradation. Most studies on this link have so far analyzed cross-country data, finding contradictory results. However, these country-level analyses suffer from the high level of dissimilarity between world regions and strong collinearity of population growth, income, and other factors. We argue that regional-level analyses can provide more robust evidence, isolating the population effect from national particularities such as policies or culture. We compile a dataset of 1062 regions within 22 European countries and analyze the effect from population growth on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and urban land use change between 1990 and 2006. Data are analyzed using panel regressions, spatial econometric models, and propensity score matching where regions with high population growth are matched to otherwise highly similar regions exhibiting significantly less growth. We find a considerable effect from regional population growth on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and urban land use increase in Western Europe. By contrast, in the new member states in the East, other factors appear more important.
Answer:
C) to allow citizens to voice their opinion
Explanation:
The skill to do this is called <span>Discriminating
You discriminate one object from another, which is why it is said that someone can have discriminating taste if they're good at telling similar things apart.</span>
They would be owned by the people as a whole - the correct answer is B.
An interesting fact: countries with communist or socialist systems often have the word"people's" in their name, for example;
"People's Republic of Poland" - historical name until 1989
"People's Republic of China" - current name
