The answer to you question is actually c
The correct answer is B. Aggregate
Explanation:
The meeting and interaction of two or more people are frequently called a social group. However, there are different types of groups depending on the way the people that are part of the group interact and are organized. In the case of aggregate individuals or collection, there is no cohesion, interaction or sense of unity between the individuals that are gathered. This means an aggregate is just different individuals that gather at the same and place but who do not interact or think about the others as a group, for example, the people waiting for a bus in a bus stop are considered as aggregate. This type of group is different from primary or secondary social groups as there is not any type of relationship, common goal or shared features between different people. Thus, if people gather in the same place at the same time but lack organization or lasting patterns of interaction they form an aggregate.
The appropriate response is confirmation bias. It is the propensity to scan for, decipher, support, and review data in a way that affirms one's prior convictions or speculations. It is a sort of subjective inclination and an efficient mistake of inductive thinking. Individuals show this predisposition when they accumulate or recollect data specifically, or when they decipher it biasedly.
I believe the answer is:<span>the government can change real output </span> <span>only by making unexpected changes in aggregate demand.
Without making the unexpected changes, the market would most likely anticipate the movement of market equilibrium and adjust that output to obtain maximum profit. Because of this, the government has to utilize the element of surprise that prevent the people on the market to create their adjustment</span>
