1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makvit [3.9K]
2 years ago
6

Given the orbits of pluto and the kbos if you wanted to search the sky for similar objects, would you look in the same part of t

he sky as you find the classical planets why or why not?
Social Studies
1 answer:
balu736 [363]2 years ago
8 0

Given the orbits of Pluto and the KBOs if you wanted to search the sky for similar objects, you will have to look into the same part of the sky because Pluto and other similar objects are a part of Kuiper belt, thus they will be find together over there.

Kuiper belt is a disc like structure in the outer solar system that extends from the orbit of Neptune to the approximately 50 astronomical units from the Sun. Though it looks similar to the asteroid belt, it is far larger than that. This belt too consists of remnants from the time of the formation of the solar system.

This Kuiper belt is a home to many dwarf planets like Pluto, Orcus and Haumea.

To learn more about Kuiper belt, click

brainly.com/question/25583240

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Which event was Japan’s attempt at keeping the US out of WWII?
Rashid [163]
D Pearl Harbor because if they knocked out as many ships as possible they wouldn’t be able to fight in wwll
8 0
3 years ago
How might you reasonably challenge the way the professor reached her conclusion?
kipiarov [429]
<span>One way to confront the professor would be to ask her to explain once more how she got the conclusion that she did. This way could cause her to catch a mistake if she made. If there is no mistake and there is simply a disagreement, then a student could also continue to ask questions as the teacher is explaining the solution. What if type questions could also be asked. Asking questions is a good way of not being disrespectful to the teacher.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
When good things happen, Lara takes credit for them, believes that the good things will last, and that they will favorably affec
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

The answer is - Optimistic

Explanation:

Explanatory style is the way in which we explain the events that happen to us in our lives, either good or bad. There is the pessimistic explanatory style and the optimistic explanatory style.

The optimistic explanatory style are characterized by explanations for negative outcomes as being due to unstable, specific and external causes  so we do not blame ourselves 100% for things that go wrong, and that the negative events will end soon and they would not let it affect too many aspects of their lives. While positive outcomes are seen as being due to stable, global and internal causes.

Lara is using optimistic explanatory style therefore she tends to have more positive explanatory style as she takes credit for positive experiences, believes that the good things will last and they will favorably affect other aspects of her life.

3 0
3 years ago
Each of the following is a factor that needs to be evaluated for moral intensity except: Group of answer choices a) Degree of so
kumpel [21]

All of the above are relevant factors to be evaluated for moral intensity except

<u>Explanation:</u>

Moral intensity is the intensity of feeling that a person has about the values of a moral choice.

  • The magnitude of the consequences: This is the quantity of the evils forced on the victims of the decision.
  • Social consensus: This is the point of social recognition that an act is either moral or sinful.
  • Proximity: This is the sense of intimacy, either culturally, psychologically, or bodily, that the soul has for the victims of the act in question.
  • The concentration of effect: This is an inverse function of the number of characters hit by an act of any given measure.
7 0
3 years ago
TRUE OR FALSE, IN ATHENS, ALL RESIDENTS WERE CONSIDERED CITIZENS AND COMID VOTE AND DECIPE
Paha777 [63]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

In Athens you were considered an official citizen with voting rights and all that if you were a 18+ male born in Athens.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • _____ is a work-study training program that teaches job skills through a combination of structured OJT and classroom training. S
    8·1 answer
  • This is a region located in the eastern United States between the Atlantic Coastal Plain and the Appalachian Mountains. This reg
    13·1 answer
  • David Setran said that this activity is most productive in helping emerging adults remain faithful to his or her beliefs through
    5·1 answer
  • The middle colonies were know for
    8·2 answers
  • 20. The primary political unit around the globe is the
    13·1 answer
  • We all get colds and flus sometimes. But what do we have today that can keep us from getting sick ? Write your ideas in this box
    15·1 answer
  • What were some of the great achievements of the Byzantine Empire?
    15·1 answer
  • Why should our folk culture be preserved? <br><br><br>plz help​
    5·1 answer
  • A)
    11·2 answers
  • Six problems of Africa​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!