1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zepelin [54]
3 years ago
11

In two or three paragraphs, compare and contrast the points of view of Wilson, Clemenceau, and Lloyd George at the Paris Peace C

onference. What were the most important goals of each leader, and how did they compare to each other?
History
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
4 0

Here is what i wrote for my essay:

World War I was settled by the victors at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919. The “Big Four,” who made all the major decisions, were President Woodrow Wilson of the United States, Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain, George Clemenceau of France, and of least importance, Italian Prime Minister Vittorio Orlando. Each major power had its own agenda coming to the Conference and not every aim was represented in the final treaties.


Wilson, Clemenceau, and Lloyd George all had different points of view at the Paris Peace Conference. For instance, lloyd George of Britain wanted to build a postwar Britain "fit for heroes". British aims at the conference were focused on securing France, settling territorial disputes, and maintaining their colonial holdings. Clemenceau of France wanted to weaken Germany so it could never threaten France. Having witnessed two German attacks on French soil in the last 40 years, France’s main concern was to ensure Germany would not be able to attack them again, so they pushed to weaken Germany militarily, strategically, and economically. Wilson of the U.S. wanted "peace without victory" with his fourteen points. The Americans’ vision was set out in Wilson’s Fourteen Points, which emphasized free trade, self-determination, and the founding of a League of Nations to support territorial and political independence of member nations.


PLEASE LIKE AND RATE MY ANSWER

You might be interested in
Why is Elie Wiesel’s Night valuable to a historian?
Vesnalui [34]

Because It is an eyewitness account of the atrocities committed at concentration camps written by a former prisoner who experienced them firsthand.

8 0
3 years ago
Claim: Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence.
Mila [183]

Answer:

A. Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation.

Explanation:

Considering the claim stated in the question, hence, among the following options, the statement that could be used as evidence in support of the claim that "Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence." is option A "Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation."

This is because a CLOSE PROXIMITY between Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand means these countries or colonies have a good rapport with Great Britain. Therefore, it was easier to negotiate their independence instead of going to war (for example USA) or series of agitation and protest to get their independence (for example India)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
S What is the central message of this speech? What is Hoover asking?
Alisiya [41]
To address the promise previously started during his initial inaugural address
3 0
2 years ago
Communist movements spread throughout Europe after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. The leaders of the new Soviet Union made
juin [17]

First Answer:

The socialism never found support among the people in United States due to small power of the workers Union. Also, companies have more political and financial power over their demands.

Second answer:

There could be more support for the homeless and poor people in big cities. Health care and some childhood protection against poverty might be another benefits from it.


Third answer:

The negative aspects we could imagine as the political power of unions increased among the workers. They would start attempting a coup across the country in order to start a social-communist regime. Another problem could be the increase in corruption, based on the good faith of the poor, that is, they could "buy votes" among the poor by threatening them with benefits' cut if the worker does not support them or does not vote for them.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss the role the United States played in World War I and its aftermath.
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

The additional firepower, resources, and soldiers of the U.S. helped to tip the balance of the war in favor of the Allies. Remaining Neutral. When war broke out in 1914, the United States had a policy of neutrality.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which condition made the western Roman empire vulnerable to attack?
    7·2 answers
  • Discuss how rivers help geographers understand how civilization developed
    6·1 answer
  • Maximilien Robespierre and the Jacobins are best known for
    9·1 answer
  • How did the open-range system of cattle ranching work?
    9·2 answers
  • What are some social motives for imperialism?
    6·1 answer
  • Who symbolizes the Mother Country? ​
    5·1 answer
  • Who led the United Nations’ effort to draft a Universal Declaration of Human Rights? Harry S. Truman Eleanor Roosevelt Winston C
    14·1 answer
  • A western cultural phenomenon, beginning around 1750 and ending about 1850, that gave precedence to feeling and imagination over
    11·1 answer
  • Como é o nome das fortificações que Dario mandou construir?
    10·1 answer
  • Who sold the Louisiana territory to the US?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!